Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Hall v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2023cv00185
Plaintiff:
Troy Hall
Defendant:
C.R. Bard, Inc. and Davol, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
USA v. Quinton Hall
as 22-5291
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
QUINTON TROY HALL
Hall v. Secretary, Department of Corrections (Pinellas County)
as 8:2019cv02090
Petitioner:
Troy Hall
Respondent:
Secretary, Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Castro et al v. United Parcel Service, Inc.
as 1:2018cv01286
Plaintiff:
Elizabeth Castro , Aquanza Jones , Kaslyn Belgrave and others
Defendant:
United Parcel Service, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Hall et al v. Davol Inc. et al
as 1:2013cv03830
Plaintiff:
Karen Hall and Troy Hall
Defendant:
DAVOL INC. and C.R. Bard Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Hall et al v. Davol Inc. et al
as 1:2013cv07457
Plaintiff:
Karen Hall and Troy Hall
Defendant:
Davol Inc. and C.R. Bard Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Patricia Haro, et al v. Kathleen Sebeliu
as 11-16606
Plaintiff - Appellee:
PATRICIA HARO, JOHN G. BALENTINE, JACK MCNUTT and others
Defendant - Appellant:
KATHLEEN SEBELIUS, Secretary of US Department of Health and Human Services
Coeyman v. Lexington County et al
as 8:2008cv02655
Plaintiff:
James Gregory Coeyman
Defendant:
Lexington County, Lexington County Detention Center, James Metts and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Eaglin v. Metts et al
as 0:2008cv02547
Plaintiff:
Adrian Tyrell Eaglin
Defendant:
James Metts, ABL Management Inc, Barrington Butler and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights, State Filers
In Re: Kugel Mesh Hernia Patch Products Liability Litigation
as 1:2007md01842
Plaintiff:
Deborah June Bilbrey, Wendy H. Risley, Lois Askins and others
Defendant:
Davol, Inc, WCO Medical Products Corporation, Baolien Nguyen Tu and others
Interested Party:
Ernest Cory
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
