Cases 1 - 10 of 77
Beck et al v. 3M Company, f/k/a Minnesota Mining and Manufacturing Company, et al
as 2:2025cv12299
Plaintiff:
Aaron Beck, David Bivens, Michael William Brehm and others
Defendant:
3M Company, f/k/a Minnesota Mining and Manufacturing Company,, AGC Chemicals Americas Inc, Allstar Fire Eqiupment and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
US v. Antoine Myles
as 25-6729
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
ANTOINE DEWAYNE MYLES, a/k/a Twan
In re: Dawson
as 25-1283
Petitioner:
TAMIKA DAWSON, a private irrevocable trust estate by and through its authorized representative of CS Trust
Respondent:
ANDREA MOLLER, Judge, El Paso County Civil Court, KIM MOTES, Trustee Coordinator, ANDREW LOGAN and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2025cv01961
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans With Disabilities Act (ADA)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2025cv00340
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2025cv00284
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
United States of America v. Crosby
as 25-352
Defendant:
RAMONE PERRY, RUFUS M. FEASTER, DAVID WATTS and others
:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
US v. Antwan Jackson
as 24-6905
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
ANTWAN LAMAR JACKSON, a/k/a Twan, a/k/a Mey-Mey
US v. Antwan Black
as 24-6746
Defendant:
ANTWAN JEREMIAH BLACK, a/k/a Twan, a/k/a Twizzy
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
FIELDS v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 9:2023cv34052
Plaintiff:
TWAN FIELDS
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
