Cases 1 - 10 of 1,330
Harrison v. Vale Oregon Irrigation District, et al.
as 24-2764
Plaintiff:
SHAD HARRISON, in his capacity as Personal Representative of The Estate of Johnathon Harrison
Defendant:
VALE OREGON IRRIGATION DISTRICT, a local government entity, TY KING and UNITED STATES BUREAU OF RECLAMATION, a federal government entity
Ackerman et al v. Arkema Inc.
as 4:2024cv01588
Plaintiff:
Dorothy Ackerman, Mary Ackerman, Sylbestre Aburto and others
Defendant:
Arkema Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Notice of Removal
X.D. et al v. County of Los Angeles et al
as 8:2024cv00902
Plaintiff:
X. D. and X. C.
Defendant:
County of Los Angeles, Deputy Ty Shelton and Does 1-10 inclusive
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Ashlock v. Johnson et al
as 1:2024cv00647
Plaintiff:
Marrio Drantrell Ashlock
Defendant:
Amarshay Johnson, Ahtreyonna Holloman and Ty-Quann Alston
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2024cv00760
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
JD Fields & Company Inc. v. Ty Samples et al
as 4:2024cv01157
Plaintiff:
JD Fields & Company Inc.
Defendant:
Ty Samples and Mammoth Carbon Products, LLC
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2024cv00677
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2024cv00678
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00775
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Stricker v. Wayfair LLC
as 1:2024cv10740
Plaintiff:
Ty Stricker
Defendant:
Wayfair LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
