Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Williams v. L'Oreal USA, Inc. et al
as 1:2023cv11657
Plaintiff:
Ty Williams
Defendant:
L'Oreal USA, Inc., L'Oreal USA Products, Inc., Namaste Laboratories LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Williams et al v. GlaxoSmithKline LLC et al
as 3:2023cv14524
Defendant:
Walmart Inc., GlaxoSmithKline LLC, GlaxoSmithKline Holdings (Americas) Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Ty Williams and Linda Williams
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv01083
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
WILLIAMS v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2020cv82485
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
TY WILLIAMS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2019cv02614
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12188
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2019cv01780
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12188
Bryant, et al. v. North Coast Natural Solutions, LLC et al.
as 1:2019cv01075
Defendant:
North Coast Natural Solutions, LLC, North Coast 5 Natural Solutions Corporation, Level 5 Global International Holdings Corporation and others
Plaintiff:
Theodore McQueen, Tenita Bryant, Marcus Moore and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Hayes v. Hamilton County Sheriff's Department et al
as 1:2016cv00036
Plaintiff:
Mitchell Hayes
Defendant:
Hamilton County Sheriff's Department and Ty Williams
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Church v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 3:2013cv00933
Plaintiff:
Ty William Church
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 0405 dc Review of SSA Decision SSDC - Concurrent Title II and Title XVI Claims
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
