Cases 11 - 20 of 48
Scott v. Sails et al
as 2:2023cv02088
Plaintiff:
William Tyler Scott
Defendant:
Montrez Jordan Sails and Fastenal Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Tort/Motor Vehicle (P.I.)
Pride v. Detroit, City of et al
as 2:2023cv10243
Plaintiff:
Corey Pride
Defendant:
City of Detroit, Nicholas Rocha, Michael Ayala and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Sims v. Detroit, City of et al
as 2:2022cv12992
Plaintiff:
Ashlee Unique Sims
Defendant:
City of Detroit, Tyler Scott Alene, Janelle Thomas and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
VANEFFEN v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2022cv13196
Plaintiff:
TYLER SCOTT LEE VANEFFEN
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Top Shelf Models LLC v. Harbor Capital LLC et al
as 3:2022cv00125
Plaintiff:
Top Shelf Models LLC
Defendant:
Harbor Capital LLC and Tyler Scott
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 501 Copyright Infringement
WATSON v 3M COMPANY et al
as 3:2021cv01810
Plaintiff:
TYLER WATSON and TYLER SCOTT ANDREW WATSON
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
LUBBERS v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2021cv28690
Plaintiff:
TYLER SCOTT LUBBERS
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
LEWIS v. FUNK et al
as 2:2020cv00414
Defendant:
CHAD TAYLOR, S. CHRISTOPHER, ROSE and others
Plaintiff:
TYLER SCOTT LEWIS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Mendinghall v. USA
as 4:2020cv00363
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Branden Tyler Scott Mendinghall, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
WATSON v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 8:2020cv63356
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
TYLER SCOTT ANDREW WATSON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
