Cases 1 - 10 of 17
FERNANDEZ v. U S DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS
as 4:2018cv00551
Defendant:
U S DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS
Plaintiff:
RICARDO JOSE FERNANDEZ
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2018cv00515
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 7703
Ellis Snowton v. U. S. Department of Veterans Affairs
as 1:2018cv01019
Plaintiff:
Piper Lakay Ellis Snowton
Defendant:
U. S. Department of Veterans Affairs
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0552
Williams v. Poydras Properties, LLC et al
as 2:2016cv15342
Plaintiff:
Denise Williams
Defendant:
Poydras Properties, LLC, Travelers Property Casualty Company of America, Empire Janitorial Sales & Service, LLC and others
Movant:
U. S. Department of Veterans Affairs
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
Marilyn Gladle v. U. S. Department of Veterans Affairs et al
as 2:2015cv00057
Defendant:
Stephen R Bauman, Stephen R Bauman, Bette Lane Turzan and Mary Moore and others
Plaintiff:
Marilyn Gladle
In re: The Estate of Larry D. Bevins
as 3:2014cv27534
Petitioner:
Terra Moore , Kimberly Mullins and Larry D. Bevins
Respondent:
United States of America and U. S. Department of Veterans Affairs
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346
Gonzales-McCaulley Investment Group Inc v. U S Department of Veterans Affairs
as 2:2013cv06877
Plaintiff:
Gonzales-McCaulley Investment Group Inc
Defendant:
U S Department of Veterans Affairs
Johnnie Smith v. United States of America et al
as 5:2013cv01528
Plaintiff:
Johnnie Smith
Defendant:
U S Department of Veterans Affairs and United States of America
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2012cv11025
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2012cv01148
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
