Cases 1 - 10 of 77
MAKERE v. FITZPATRICK et al
as 4:2022cv00315
Plaintiff:
ELIAS MAKERE
Defendant:
MARTIN FITZPATRICK, CHARLES J.F. SCHREIBER, JR., MARK WALKER and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Tisdel
as 4:2022cv02350
Plaintiff:
Janece Tisdel
Defendant:
The Witness Protection Program (WPP) and The U S District Court Southern District
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Curtis Brown, Sr. v. Court of Appeals
as 22-6135
Plaintiff / Appellant:
CURTIS JEROME BROWN, SR.
Defendant / Appellee:
COURT OF APPEALS, JUDGE DAVID C. NORTON, U.S. DISTRICT COURT and others
Clark et al v. The State of Georgia et al
as 1:2021cv04461
Plaintiff:
Robert L. Clark, Leroy Rogers, DeAngelo Cook and others
Defendant:
The State of Georgia, Sutton Richardson, Stephen Garner and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Derise v. District Court
as 6:2021cv03669
Plaintiff:
Beau A Derise
Defendant:
U S District Court
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Derise v U S District Court
as 6:2021cv03670
Plaintiff:
Beau A Derise
Defendant:
U S District Court
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Derise v. Western District
as 6:2021cv01626
Plaintiff:
Beau Ashley Derise and Beau Derise
Defendant:
U S District Court Western District
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Kent Bell v. State of Maryland
as 21-6842
Defendant / Appellee:
STATE OF MARYLAND and U. S. DISTRICT COURT, DISTRICT OF MARYLAND
Plaintiff / Appellant:
KENT BELL
Warth v. U. S. District Court Clerk's Office Cash Register et al
as 1:2020cv04059
Respondent:
U. S. District Court Clerk's Office Cash Register and Atlanta Federal Reserve Bank, Trustees
Petitioner:
David Warth
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Roman v. U. S. District Court Northern District of Georgia
as 1:2020mi00045
Plaintiff:
Jason Elliott Roman, III
Defendant:
U. S. District Court Northern District of Georgia and Clerk's Office
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
