Cases 1 - 10 of 15
Soto v. U.P.S. et al
as 1:2026cv05114
Plaintiff:
Eric A. Soto
Defendant:
U.P.S., U.S.P.S., FedEx and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2026cv05250
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question
Garner v. U.S.P.S et al
as 3:2025cv00455
Defendant:
U.S.P.S, U.P.S., Judge Matthew Thomas Tuck and others
Plaintiff:
DeCarlo A Garner, Jr
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00236
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (other)
Richardson et al v. Herrera et al
as 2:2022cv04370
Plaintiff:
Gregory Richardson and Terrance Sevalia
Defendant:
Mario Ernesto Herrera, Penske Truck Leasing, Co., L.P., TForce Freight, Inc. f/k/a U.P.S. Ground Freight, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Tort/Motor Vehicle (P.I.)
Caston v. Murillo et al
as 1:2021cv05919
Plaintiff:
Charles Caston
Defendant:
Cathy Murillo, Erica Brown, Richard L. Braddock and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Caston v. Turner et al
as 1:2021cv05918
Plaintiff:
Charles Caston
Defendant:
Sylvester Turner, Houston Live Stock and Radio, Olympic Committee and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
CASTON v. CITY OF NEW YORK POLICE DEPARTMENT et al
as 2:2021cv03827
Plaintiff:
CHARLES CASTON
Defendant:
CITY OF NEW YORK POLICE DEPARTMENT, STEPHEN SCHWARZMAN, JONATHAN GRAY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Kelly v. U.P.S. Store et al
as 9:2020cv00182
Defendant:
Jane Doe and U.P.S. Store
Plaintiff:
Stephen P. Kelly
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1391
ZIMMERMAN v. STAPLES INC. et al
as 3:2018cv16988
Defendant:
STAPLES INC. and U.P.S CORPORATE
Plaintiff:
DEBORAH ZIMMERMAN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1330
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
