Cases 21 - 30 of 79
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2017cv12273
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
ROSEBAR et al v. BROOKS et al
as 1:2017cv00978
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL ROSEBAR and ERIN ROSEBAR
Defendant:
DAVID BROOKS, WENDELL ROBINSON, WILLIAM C. JOHNSON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Handlon v. United States of America et al
as 2:2017cv00273
Plaintiff:
Quinton Paul Handlon
Defendant:
United States of America, State of Florida, Charlotte County and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
ROSEBAR et al v. HOGAN et al
as 1:2017cv00932
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL LAWRENCE ROSEBAR, ERIN MICHELLE ROSEBAR and MILTON J. TAYLOR-EL
Defendant:
THOMAS F. HOGAN, U.S. ATTORNEY'S OFFICE, JOHN P. MARSTON and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Gullett-El v. Watson et al
as 3:2017cv00472
Petitioner:
Taquan Rahshe Gullett-El
Respondent:
Kim Lee Watson, Jim Haskett, Patrick Sheridan and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Hephzibah-El v. Anderson et al
as 3:2017cv00440
Petitioner:
Syteria Hephzibah-El
Respondent:
Irish Anderson, Cedric L Donar, Kim Lee Watson and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2017cv02763
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329
HARRISON COUNTY HOSPITAL v. PRICE
as 1:2017cv00939
Plaintiff:
HARRISON COUNTY HOSPITAL
Defendant:
THOMAS E. PRICE
Interested Party:
U.S. ATTORNEY GENERAL and U.S. ATTORNEY'S OFFICE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1395 HHS: Adverse Reimbursement Review
PENDERGRASS v. UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE et al
as 1:2017cv00546
Plaintiff:
JAMES ANTHONY PENDERGRASS
Defendant:
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE , U.S. DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS , U.S. ATTORNEY'S OFFICE and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2017cv10412
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
