Cases 1 - 10 of 34
Wilkerson v. WHO et al
as 1:2021cv01211
Plaintiff:
Paul Wilkerson
Defendant:
WHO, CDC, Bill Gates and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Avdeef v. US Department of Justice et al
as 4:2021cv00451
Defendant:
Texas Governor Greg Abbott, Patrick W. Powers, Judge Don Cosby and others
Plaintiff:
Stephen M Avdeef
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2020cv01933
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Ramiro Plascencia-Orozco v. John Houston, et al
as 20-55129
Defendant / Appellee:
ALANA W. ROBINSON, LAURA E. DUFFY, U.S. Attorney Chief, JOHN A. HOUSTON and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
RAMIRO PLASCENCIA-OROZCO, AKA Alberto Jose Del Muro, AKA Alberto Jose Del Muro-Guerrero, AKA Alberto Jose Muro-Guerrero, AKA Raul Torres-Garcia
ELLERBE v. THE PRESIDENT OF THE U.S. et al
as 2:2020cv00211
Defendant:
THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE U.S., THE EXECUTIVE BRANCH OF THE U.S. GOV., THE U.S.P.S. AND IT'S BOARD OF GOVERNORS and others
Plaintiff:
DERRICK J. ELLERBE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Daniel Cobble v. U.S. Gov.
as 19-11362
Defendant / Appellee:
U.S. GOV.
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DANIEL ERIC COBBLE
WILSON v. U.S. GOV'T et al
as 2:2018cv00460
Plaintiff:
ROGER WILSON
Defendant:
U.S. GOV'T, U.S. POST OFFICE and MEMPHIS CLERK OF COURTS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
WILSON v. U.S. GOV'T et al
as 2:2018cv00459
Plaintiff:
ROGER WILSON
Defendant:
U.S. GOV'T, U.S. POST OFFICE and MEMPHIS CLERK OF COURTS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Wilson v. U.S. Gov't et al
as 1:2018cv00772
Plaintiff:
Roger Wilson
Defendant:
U.S. Gov't and State of Maryland
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Wilson v. U.S. Gov't et al
as 2:2018cv02181
Plaintiff:
Roger Wilson
Defendant:
U.S. Gov't and Memphis FCI
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
