Cases 1 - 10 of 32
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv13186
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Other:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
Amazon.com Inc et al v. Peng et al
as 2:2023cv00607
Plaintiff:
Amazon.com, Inc., Amazon.com Services LLC, UL LLC and others
Defendant:
Cao Peng, Shenzhen Peng Chuangxing Technology Co., Ltd., Shenzhen Tongxin Technology Co., Ltd. and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1114 Trademark Infringement
CASE NUMBER NOT USED
as 2:2023cv00608
Plaintiff:
Amazon.com, Inc., Amazon.com Services LLC and UL LLC
Defendant:
Cao Peng, Shenzhen Peng Chuangxing Technology Co., Ltd., Shenzhen Tongxin Technology Co., Ltd. and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1114 Trademark Infringement
Floyd v. UL, LLC
as 5:2022cv05112
Plaintiff:
Brandon Floyd
Defendant:
UL, LLC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601 Family and Medical Leave Act of 1993
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2021cv09736
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
UL LLC v. Gibson
as 1:2021cv00766
Plaintiff:
UL LLC
Defendant:
Graham D. Gibson and Graham Gibson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Other Contract
UL LLC v. 7111495 Canada Inc. et al
as 1:2020cv05308
Defendant:
Warehouse Goods LLC, Greenlane Holdings, Inc., Greenlane Holdings, LLC and others
Plaintiff:
UL LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1051
UL LLC v. ManSeeManWant LLC et al
as 3:2019cv03103
Defendant:
James Ellenberg and ManSeeManWant LLC
Plaintiff:
UL LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
UL LLC v. AFG Distribution, Inc. et al
as 1:2019cv02724
Defendant:
World Wholesale, Inc., Green Rush, Greenlane Holdings, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
UL LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1051
UL LLC v. Jian Long Zhao et al
as 2:2018cv03077
Defendant:
JTL Import Inc., Wen Hui Lian and Jia Ling Zhao
Plaintiff:
UL LLC
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
