Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 12
Casanova v. Pfizer and Affiliates et al
as 3:2024cv00396
Plaintiff: Ashley Casanova
Defendant: Pfizer and Affiliates, Actalent Temporary Agency and Affiliates, GRAIL INC. and Affiliates and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Ashley Casanova v. Joe Biden
as 24-1235
Plaintiff: ASHLEY CASANOVA
Defendant: PRESIDENT JOE BIDEN, FEDERAL GOVERNMENT, NORTH CAROLINA and others
Pennsylvania State Conference of NAACP Branches, et al v. Northampton County Board of Elections, et al
as 23-3166
Plaintiff / Appellee: PENNSYLVANIA STATE CONFERENCE OF NAACP BRANCHES, LEAGUE OF WOMAN VOTERS OF PENNSYLVANIA, PHILADELPHIANS ORGANIZED TO WITNESS EMPOWER AND REBUILD and others
Defendant / Appellee: NORTHAMPTON COUNTY BOARD OF ELECTIONS, SECRETARY COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA, ADAMS COUNTY BOARD OF ELECTIONS and others
Not Yet Classified: RICHARD MARINO, DEMOCRATIC SENATORIAL CAMPAIGN COMMITTEE, DEMOCRATIC CONGRESSIONAL CAMPAIGN COMMITTEE and others
Intervenor Defendant / Appellant: REPUBLICAN NATIONAL COMMITTEE, NATIONAL REPUBLICAN CONGRESSIONAL COMMITTEE and REPUBLICAN PARTY OF PENNSYLVANIA
Appellant: STATE OF ALABAMA, BRYAN CUTLER, KIM WARD and others
Amicus Curiae: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Appellee: THE PROTECT DEMOCRACY PROJECT and SENIORLAW CENTER
Casanova v. Biden et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2023cv00392
Plaintiff: Ashley Casanova
Defendant: President Joe Biden, Federal Government, North Carolina and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. UNION COUNTY et al
as 2:2023cv02531
Plaintiff: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant: UNION COUNTY, UNION COUNTY CLERK JOANNE RAJOPPI, in her official capacity and UNION COUNTY BOARD OF ELECTIONS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
EAKIN et al v. ADAMS COUNTY BOARD OF ELECTIONS et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2022cv00340
Plaintiff: BETTY EAKIN, INES MASSELLA, FETTERMAN FOR PA and others
Defendant: ADAMS COUNTY BOARD OF ELECTIONS, ALLEGHENY COUNTY BOARD OF ELECTIONS, BEAVER COUNTY BOARD OF ELECTIONS and others
Intervenor: DAVID BALL, JAMES D. BEE, DEBRA BIRO and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
PENNSYLVANIA STATE CONFERENCE OF THE NAACP et al v. CHAPMAN et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2022cv00339
Plaintiff: PENNSYLVANIA STATE CONFERENCE OF THE NAACP, LEAGUE OF WOMEN VOTERS OF PENNSYLVANIA, PHILADELPHIANS ORGANIZED TO WITNESS and others
Defendant: LEIGH M. CHAPMAN, ADAMS COUNTY BOARD OF ELECTIONS, ALLEGHENY COUNTY BOARD OF ELECTIONS and others
Intervenor: DAVID BALL, JAMES D. BEE, DEBRA BIRO and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Jim Bognet, et al v. Secretary Commonwealth of PA, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 20-3214
Defendant: WYOMING COUNTY BOARD OF ELECTIONS, JEFFERSON COUNTY BOARD OF ELECTIONS, MIFFLIN COUNTY BOARD OF ELECTIONS and others
Defendant / Appellee: CLARION COUNTY BOARD OF ELECTIONS, LACKAWANNA COUNTY BOARD OF ELECTIONS, DAUPHIN COUNTY BOARD OF ELECTIONS and others
Not Yet Classified: DEMOCRATIC NATIONAL COMMITTEE
Plaintiff / Appellant: DEBRA MILLER, ALAN CLARK, JIM BOGNET and others
BOGNET et al v. BOOCKVAR et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2020cv00215
Defendant: CAMBRIA COUNTY BOARD OF ELECTIONS, INDIANA COUNTY BOARD OF ELECTIONS, MONTOUR COUNTY BOARD OF ELECTIONS and others
Plaintiff: JENNIFER CLARK, DEBRA MILLER, JIM BOGNET and others
Intervenor Defendant: Democratic National Committee
Amicus Curiae: Governor Arnold A. Schwarzenegger
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Bolus v. Boockvar et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2020cv01882
Defendant: Cambria County Board of Elections, Indiana County Board of Elections, Montour County Board of Elections and others
Plaintiff: Bob Bolus
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?