Cases 21 - 30 of 2,276
DUBOSE et al v. U.S ATTORNEY GENERAL et al
as 2:2024cv01542
Plaintiff:
ABDUSH DUBOSE, ZUMAR DUBOSE and KARIEM DUBOSE
Defendant:
U.S ATTORNEY GENERAL, UNITED PARCEL SERVICE, INC, U.S. POSTAL SERVICE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Raudez Mejia v. United Parcel Service, Inc.
as 2:2024cv00246
Plaintiff:
Vilce Jose Raudez Mejia
Defendant:
United Parcel Service, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Personal Injury
Manning v. Bloodworth et al
as 3:2024cv00372
Plaintiff:
Darcye Manning
Defendant:
Glenn Bloodworth and United Parcel Service, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal- Personal Injury
United Parcel Service Inc v. NLRB
as 24-1530
Petitioner:
UNITED PARCEL SERVICE INC
Respondent:
NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD
Intervenor:
ROBERT C. ATKINSON, JR.
NLRB v. United Parcel Service Inc
as 24-1531
Petitioner:
NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD
Intervenor:
ROBERT C. ATKINSON, JR.
Respondent:
UNITED PARCEL SERVICE INC
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv10762
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv02415
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
ENDRES v. AIR CANADA, INC. et al
as 1:2024cv00883
Plaintiff:
STEVEN ENDRES
Defendant:
AIR CANADA, INC., AIR FRANCE-KLM S.A., ALASKA AIR GROUP, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1964 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Sevillano-Seda v. Union de Tronquistas de Puerto Rico, Local 901 et al
as 3:2024cv01143
Plaintiff:
Jose Rafael Sevillano-Seda
Defendant:
Union de Tronquistas de Puerto Rico, Local 901, United Parcel Service, Inc., United Parcel Service Co. and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 0401 Labor Management Disclosure Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00520
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 621 Job Discrimination (Age)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
