Cases 11 - 20 of 23
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2016cv00458
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Marcus v. United Parcel Service (UPS)
as 5:2014cv01625
Defendant:
United Parcel Service (UPS)
Plaintiff:
Anthony Marcus
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2013cv00242
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2012cv03183
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2012cv03183
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2012cv02760
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
DAVIDSON v. UNITED PARCEL SERVICE (UPS) et al
as 2:2011cv00894
Plaintiff:
DAVID DAVIDSON
Defendant:
UNITED PARCEL SERVICE (UPS) , CRAWFORD & CO. , JOHN DOE 1-25 and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Dennis Lesinsky v. United Parcel Service UPS et al
as 2:2009cv03896
Plaintiff:
Dennis Lesinsky, Dennis Lesinsky and Dennis Lesinsky
Defendant:
United Parcel Service UPS, United Parcel Service UPS, United Parcel Service UPS and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
PISKO v. UNITED PARCEL SERVICE (UPS), INC. et al
as 1:2007cv05680
Plaintiff:
HAROLD "BUD" PISKO
Defendant:
UNITED PARCEL SERVICE (UPS), INC., JOSEPH ALOI, JEFF MINISCH and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Negron-Fuentes, et al v. UPS SCS, et al
as 07-2463
Plaintiff - Appellant:
IVAN NEGRON-FUENTES, MILDRED PEREZ, CONJUGAL PARTNERSHIP and others
Defendant - Appellee:
UNITED PARCEL SERVICE, UPS SUPPLY CHAIN SOLUTIONS, f/k/a UPS Logistics Gp. UPS Logistics Group, UPS SCS, BROADSPIRE SERVICES, INC. and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
