Cases 1 - 10 of 16
United Staes v. Lopez
as 23-2121
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STAES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
MARTIN LOPEZ
Cantrell V. United States of America
as 1:2022cv01286
Petitioner:
Leonard Cantrell
Respondent:
United Staes of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Nunez v. United States of America
as 1:2022cv02629
Plaintiff:
Laura Nunez
Defendant:
United Staes of America and United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2671 Federal Tort Claims Act
Grace v. United States of America
as 1:2021cv23320
Plaintiff:
Gary Grace and Garry Grace
Defendant:
United Staes Of America., and United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Schulte v. United Staes of America et al
as 1:2021cv05554
Defendant:
United Staes of America, Wardens of MCC and SHU Lietenants of MCC
Plaintiff:
Joshua Adam Schulte
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Glover v. United Staes of America
as 5:2020cv00102
Petitioner:
Marco Glover
Respondent:
United Staes of America and United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA FOR THE USE AND BENEFIT OF HARDHART WORKFORCE SOLUTIONS, LLC v. BESDB, PLLC et al
as 1:2018cv00987
Defendant:
BES DESIGN/BUILD, LLC, BESDB, PLLC and AEGIS SECURITY INSURANCE COMPANY
Plaintiff:
THE UNITED STAES OF AMERICA FOR THE USE AND BENEFIT OF HARDHART WORKFORCE SOLUTIONS, LLC
Cause Of Action: 40 U.S.C. § 3131
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2018cv00119
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Miranda v. United Staes of America et al
as 5:2017cv00612
Plaintiff:
Jose' E. Lopez Miranda
Defendant:
United Staes of America, Federal Bureau of Prisons and United States Marshal Service
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Chachnko v. United Staes of America
as 5:2017cv05029
Plaintiff:
Yuri Chachanko
Respondent:
United Staes of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
