Cases
Cases 51 - 60 of 956
American Farm Bureau Federation et al v. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency et al
as 3:2023cv00020
Plaintiff: American Farm Bureau Federation, American Petroleum Institute, American Road and Transportation Builders Association and others
Defendant: U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Michael S. Regan, United States Army Corps Of Engineers and others
Petitioner: Bayou City Waterkeeper
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
State of Texas et al v. United States Environmental Protection Agency et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2023cv00017
Plaintiff: STATE OF TEXAS, Texas Commission On Environmental Quality, Railroad Commission of Texas and others
Defendant: United States Environmental Protection Agency, Michael Regan, United States Army Corps Of Engineers and others
Petitioner: Bayou City Waterkeeper
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
One Hundred Miles v. The United States Army Corps of Engineers et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 4:2022cv00297
Plaintiff: One Hundred Miles
Defendant: The United States Army Corps of Engineers and Col. Joseph Geary
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0701 Maritime Subsidy Board
Cape Fear River Watch v. United States Army Corps of Engineers
as 22-2223
Plaintiff / Appellee: CAPE FEAR RIVER WATCH, DEFENDERS OF WILDLIFE and NORTH CAROLINA WILDLIFE FEDERATION
Defendant / Appellant: UNITED STATES ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS and BENJAMIN A. BENNETT, Colonel, in his official capacity as U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Wilmington District Commander
Bayou City v. US Army Corps
as 22-40770
Plaintiff / Appellant: Bayou City Waterkeeper
Defendant / Appellee: United States Army Corps of Engineers, Lieutenant General Scott A. Spellmon, in his official capacity as Chief and Commander of Engineers, United States Army Corps of Engineers, Colonel Timothy R. Vail, in his official capacity as District Engineer, Galveston District, United States Army Corps of Engineers and others
Shelly & Sands, Inc. et al v. Dement et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2022cv04144
Plaintiff: Shelly & Sands, Inc. and S & S Terminal, Inc.
Defendant: Rick Dement, Rayland Marina LLC, Ohio River Marine LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1333 Admiralty
Rhoades v. United States Army Corps of Engineers We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2022cv00728
Plaintiff: William Rhoades
Defendant: United States Army Corps of Engineers
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1345 Injunctive and Declaratory Relief
The Coalition to Protect Puget Sound Habitat v. United States Army Corps of Engineers, et al
as 22-35938
Plaintiff / Appellee: THE COALITION TO PROTECT PUGET SOUND HABITAT, a non-profit corporation
Defendant / Appellant: UNITED STATES ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS, an agency of the United States of America, TODD T. SEMONITE, Lieutenant General, in his official capacity as Chief of Engineers of the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, SCOTT A. SPELLMON, Brigadier General, in his official capacity as Commander of the Northwestern Division of the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers and others
Intervenor Defendant / Appellant: TAYLOR SHELLFISH COMPANY, INC.
O'Neill et al v. United States Army Corps of Engineers et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 6:2022cv01789
Plaintiff: Thomas A. O'Neill and Habitat Institute
Defendant: United States Army Corps of Engineers, Jodi Clifford, Nedenia Kennedy and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
NATIONAL WILDLIFE REFUGE ASSOCIATION et al v. UNITED STATES ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2022cv03498
Plaintiff: NATIONAL WILDLIFE REFUGE ASSOCIATION, NATIONAL PARKS CONSERVATION ASSOCIATION, CENTER FOR BIOLOGICAL DIVERSITY and others
Defendant: UNITED STATES ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS and MICHAEL CONNOR
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0701 Judicial Review of Agency Decision

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?