Cases 11 - 20 of 127
Rochester v. Clerk et al
as 6:2020cv04249
Defendant:
Oconee County Magistrate Judges, Beth Drake, United States Marshal's Service and others
Plaintiff:
Julian E Rochester
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Salazar et al v. Fields et al
as 7:2020cv00195
Plaintiff:
J C-H, Ms. Luz Huerta Salazar, Mr. Jose F Toribio and others
Defendant:
Mr. James Russell Fields, UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, United States Marshals Service and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2271
Sharp v. United States Marshals Service et al
as 5:2020ct03282
Defendant:
United States Marshals Service, Daniel William Smith, Pitt County Detention Center and others
Plaintiff:
Kijuan Haassan Sharp
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Cory Jacobs v. U.S. Marshals Service
as 20-7032
Defendant / Appellee:
UNITED STATES MARSHALS SERVICE, Three Unknown Named Deputies, PIEDMONT REGIONAL JAIL, Unknown Name and Number of Staff and Warden, WELL PATH MEDICAL SERVICES OF PIEDMONT REGIONAL JAIL, and Unknown Name Supervisor and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
CORY LEE JACOBS
Hugue v. Harvat et al
as 9:2020cv01963
Defendant:
Michael Harvat and United States Marshal Service
Plaintiff:
Maranda Hugue
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2671
Christopher James v. US Marshals
as 20-6282
Defendant / Appellee:
UNITED STATES MARSHALS SERVICE and UNKNOWN DEFENDANTS, Drivers
Plaintiff / Appellant:
CHRISTOPHER JAMES
Faulkner v. United States Marshal Services
as 1:2020cv00453
Respondent:
United States Marshal Services
Petitioner:
Alvin Faulkner
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Robert Hedrick v. United States Marshal's
as 19-7598
Defendant / Appellee:
UNITED STATES MARSHALS SERVICE
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ROBERT L. HEDRICK
FAULKNER v. UNITED STATES MARSHAL SERVICE
as 1:2019cv01096
Petitioner:
ALVIN FAULKNER
Respondent:
UNITED STATES MARSHAL SERVICE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 7:2019cv00573
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
