Cases 1 - 10 of 473
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv04768
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petition
Naicom Corporation, et al v. Dish Network Corporation, et al
as 24-1416
Plaintiff:
NAICOM CORPORATION, D&V IP HOLDINGS, LLC, PAYLINK, LLC and others
Defendant:
DISH NETWORK CORPORATION, DISH NETWORK L.L.C., NAGRASTAR L.L.C. and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv21594
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petition
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv21598
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petition
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv03375
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Rana v. Mayorkas et al
as 1:2024cv03059
Plaintiff:
Ravi Rana
Defendant:
Secretary Alejandro Mayorkas, UR M JADDOU, TED H. KIM and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0701 Administrative Procedure Act
Eskaros v. Executive Office of Immigration Review
as 1:2024cv02992
Plaintiff:
Andrew Eskaros
Defendant:
Executive Office of Immigration Review and us attorneys office
Nziza et al v. Mayorkas et al
as 1:2024cv01001
Plaintiff:
Villard Nziza, Ornella Ariane Nibasumba and Senay Mael Nziza
Defendant:
Alejandro Mayorkas, Ur M. Jaddou, Ted H. Kim and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act - Right of Review
Rajkarnikar v. US Attorney's Office
as 3:2024cv00446
Plaintiff:
Nirjala Rajkarnikar
Defendant:
US Attorney's Office, David Azia, US Attorneys and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv02346
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
