Cases 1 - 10 of 25
Devin Wade v. US Justice Department
as 5:2023cv02403
Plaintiff:
Devin Wade
Defendant:
US Justice Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Rodriguez v. TDCJ
as 6:2023cv00135
Plaintiff:
Tommy Rodriguez
Defendant:
TDCJ, FBI Cyber Crimes Division, Transpride Initiative and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
SHEPHARD v. BIDEN et al
as 1:2022cv02228
Plaintiff:
ALONZO DEAN SHEPHARD
Defendant:
JOE BIDEN, KAMALA HARRIS, MERRICK B. GARLAND and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lee et al v. US Justice Department et al
as 5:2020cv00632
Plaintiff:
Gun Owners Foundation, Sandra Lee and Gun Owners of America Inc
Defendant:
Regina Lombardo, Bureau of Alcohol Tobacco Firearms and Explosives and US Justice Department
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702
Slusser v. Attorney General, State of Floridaa et al
as 3:2017cv00235
Petitioner:
Rodney R Slusser
Respondent:
State of Michigan, State of Indiana and US Justice department
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Lewis v. US Justice Department et al
as 2:2016cv01112
Plaintiff:
Anthony Eugene Lewis
Defendant:
US Justice Department and Loretta Lynch
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Harper v. US Justice Department
as 5:2016cv00673
Plaintiff:
Montorey D. Harper
Defendant:
US Justice Department
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Harper v. US Justice Department
as 5:2016cv00668
Plaintiff:
Montorey D. Harper
Defendant:
US Justice Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Harper v. US Justice Department
as 5:2016cv00669
Plaintiff:
Montorey D. Harper
Defendant:
US Justice Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Harper et al v. San Diego, City of et al
as 3:2016cv00992
Plaintiff:
Montorey D. Harper and Montorey LLC
Defendant:
San Diego, City of, San Diego Sheriff Department, Police Department and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
