Cases 31 - 40 of 139
Brud Rossmann v. Susan Wojcicki, et al
as 19-55359
Defendant / Appellee:
LENNERT LEADER, ELLEN SEGAL HUVELLE, US District Court Judge, US District Court, MIRIAM SEWELL, The District of Columbia, Rehabilitation Services Agency, Department of Disability Services and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
BRUD ROSSMANN
Jennings v. Andrews et al
as 5:2019ct03075
Defendant:
Rod Rosenstein, Supervised Release Officer, Hugh Hurwitz and others
Plaintiff:
Raymond R. Jennings
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Johnson v. ICE et al
as 4:2019cv00107
Defendant:
Jonathan Hortan, US Probation, USCIS and others
Plaintiff:
Vaughn Johnson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Johnson v. ICE et al
as 1:2019cv20230
Defendant:
DOS, ICE, US Probation and others
Plaintiff:
Vaughn Johnson
Johnson v. ICE et al
as 6:2019cv00040
Defendant:
Jonathan Hortan, US Probation, USCIS and others
Plaintiff:
Vaughn Johnson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Gaulke v. Collins et al
as 2:2018cv01364
Defendant:
Jane Doe, John Doe, Bobby L Collins and others
Plaintiff:
Joshua Allan Gaulke
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
USA v. Adams
as 1:2018cr00086
Defendant:
Rossi Lorathio Adams, II, Rossi Adams and Polo
Interested Party:
US Probation
Plaintiff:
USA
Dial v. US Department of Veterans Affairs et al
as 2:2018cv01326
Defendant:
US Department of Veterans Affairs, US Probation Office, Social Security Administration and others
Plaintiff:
Ray P Dial and Ray Phillips Dial
Cause Of Action: Civil Miscellaneous Case
Perez v. United States of America et al
as 2:2018cv00185
Petitioner:
Steven Reynaldo Perez
Respondent:
United States of America, Federal Bureau of Prisons, U S Marshals and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Mellinger v. US Probation Office
as 1:2018cv00069
Petitioner:
Daniel Mellinger
Respondent:
US Probation Office
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
