Cases 31 - 40 of 40
BODIFORD v. US XPRESS INC et al
as 3:2014cv00335
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL BODIFORD
Defendant:
US XPRESS INC and THOMAS H CROWLEY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
BODIFORD v. CROWLEY et al
as 4:2014cv00125
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL BODIFORD
Defendant:
THOMAS CROWLEY, US XPRESS INC and JOHN DOE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Otter et al v. US Xpress, Inc. et al
as 1:2013cv00267
Defendant:
US Xpress, Inc. , Jaxson Trucking, Inc. and Robert Keith Evans
Plaintiff:
Candy Otter and Greg Otter
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Tort/Motor Vehicle (P.I.)
DILLEY v. BURRIDGE et al
as 5:2012cv01133
Plaintiff:
BUTLER FREDERICK DILLEY
Defendant:
TERRANCE BURRIDGE, US XPRESS, INC., US EXPRESS LEASING, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Cole v. Agnew et al
as 2:2012cv00055
Plaintiff:
Kathy L. Cole
Defendant:
Michael Agnew, Total Transportation of Mississippi, LLC and US Xpress, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2010cv00111
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Auto Negligence
Kabasinskas v. Haskin et al
as 5:2009cv01407
Plaintiff:
Lenore Kabasinskas
Defendant:
William R Haskin, George W Wesley, II, US Xpress Inc and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Auto Negligence
Foggle v. US Xpress Inc
as 3:2009cv00496
Plaintiff:
Yolanda Foggle and Yolanda Foggle
Defendant:
US Xpress Inc and US Xpress Inc
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Harris v. Liberty Mutual Insurance Company et al
as 1:2009cv00449
Plaintiff:
Kachena Harris and Kachena Harris
Defendant:
Lawrence Oliver Keller, US XPress, Inc., US XPress, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Motor Vehicle
Bednarz v. Green et al
as 5:2007cv01528
Plaintiff:
Ian Bednarz and Ian Bednarz
Defendant:
Rickey Green, US Xpress, Inc., US Xpress Enterprises, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
