Cases
Cases 101 - 110 of 265,613
Ameriway Corporation v. Chen
as 24-1298
Not Yet Classified: AMERIWAY CORPORATION and MAY YAN CHEN
Defendant: ABILITY CUSTOMS INC., EAGLE TRADING USA, LLC, XIYAN ZHANG and others
Nieto v. USA
as 3:2024cv01169
Petitioner: Sofio Nieto, Jr
Respondent: USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
JOHNSON v. USA
as 1:2024cv00761
Plaintiff: MICHAEL D. JOHNSON
Defendant: USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1491 Tucker Act
LANCASTER et al v. USA
as 1:2024cv00766
Plaintiff: CATHERINE JUNE LANCASTER and PAUL LANCASTER
Defendant: USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1491 Tucker Act
South et al v. 3M Company et al
as 2:2024cv00597
Defendant: 3M Company, Du Pont De Nemours Inc, UTC Fire & Security Americas Corporation Inc and others
Plaintiff: Robert South, Edward W Allsman, David L Berry and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal
Barefield v. USA
as 4:2024cv00424
Petitioner: Christopher Barefield
Respondent: USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Kimes v. USA
as 2:2024cv00081
Petitioner: Andy Dennison Kimes
Respondent: USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Collins v. Beauty Bell Enterprises LLC et al
as 1:2024cv03859
Defendant: Beauty Bell Enterprises LLC, House of Cheatham, Inc., Godrej SON Holdings, Inc and others
Plaintiff: Lisa Collins
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Anderson v. AFAM CONCEPT, INC., et al
as 1:2024cv03877
Plaintiff: Ladene Anderson
Defendant: AFAM CONCEPT, INC., doing business as JF Labs, Inc., Avlon Industries, Godrej SON Holdings, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Barragan Farias v. USA
as 3:2024cv01136
Petitioner: Jorge Luis Barragan Farias
Respondent: USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?