Cases 1 - 10 of 17
Morrow v. Genius Fund et al
as 3:2024cv00039
Plaintiff:
Andrea Morrow
Defendant:
Genius Fund, Liam Palmieri, Chris Finelli and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv02133
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12112 Americans with Disabilities Act - Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2020cv13991
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal - Employment Discrim
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2020cv01793
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
L. Ruther v. USA Today
as 17-7129
Plaintiff - Appellant:
L. Ruther
Defendant - Appellee:
USA Today, Gannett Company
RUTHER v. USA TODAY GANNETT COMPANY
as 1:2017cv01385
Plaintiff:
L. RUTHER
Defendant:
USA TODAY GANNETT COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Engel v Gray Television & Subsidiaries, et al
as 6:2017cv03190
Plaintiff:
Noel John Paul Engel
Defendant:
Gray Television & Subsidiaries, Sinclair Broadcast Group, Inc., FOX Network & Subsidiaries and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343
Pamela Melvin v. SSA
as 16-2248
Plaintiff - Appellant:
PAMELA MELVIN
Defendant - Appellee:
SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION, DR. MEYMANDI ASSAD and DR. ELEANOR CRUISE
Defendant:
THE WASHINGTON POST, USA TODAY, THE BOSTON GLOBE and others
MILLER v. WHEELER et al
as 3:2016cv00058
Defendant:
MATT BAI, LARRY BUSCHON, TOM CIBROWSKI and others
Plaintiff:
JESHA DONALDSON MILLER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Miller, Jesha v. Wheeler, Tom et al
as 3:2016cv00014
Plaintiff:
Jesha Donaldson Miller
Defendant:
Tom Wheeler, Tom Cibrowksi, Matt Bai and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
