Cases 81 - 90 of 212
FERGUSON v. CITY OF KOKOMO et al
as 1:2020cv02539
Defendant:
CITY OF KOKOMO, USPS and KOKOMO POLICE DEPARTMENT
Plaintiff:
KENNETH S. FERGUSON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Birkos v. Sykes
as 1:2020cv05325
Plaintiff:
Roksana Birkos
Defendant:
Dominique Sykes Individually and as Agent of United States Postal Service d/b/a USPS Postal Service d/b/a USPS d/b/a Postal Service, Dominique Sykes Individually and as Agent of United States Postal Service doing business as USPS doing business as Postal Service and United States Postal Service individually doing business as USPS doing business as Postal Service
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Farr v. Warden of Marion USP et al
as 3:2020cv00808
Plaintiff:
Keenon J. Farr
Defendant:
Federal Bureau of Prisons and Warden of Marion USP
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Frankie Brown v. Warden, USP McCreary
as 20-2331
Respondent / Appellee:
WARDEN, USP MCCREARY
Petitioner / Appellant:
FRANKIE BROWN
Wesley Ira Purkey v. Warden, USP Terre Haute, et al
as 20-2280
Respondent / Appellee:
WARDEN, USP TERRE HAUTE, MICHAEL CARVAJAL and WILLIAM P. BARR, Attorney General of the United States
Petitioner / Appellant:
WESLEY I. PURKEY
BRYANT v. WARDEN, USP TERRE HAUTE
as 2:2020cv00300
Respondent:
WARDEN USP TERRE HAUTE
Petitioner:
KHALID BRYANT
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Ellis, Jr. v. Thomson
as 3:2020cv50002
Respondent:
USP Thomson
Petitioner:
Frankie Cornell Ellis, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Fonville v. Rivers
as 3:2019cv50324
Defendant:
Thomson USP Warden
Plaintiff:
Kendan Fonville
Respondent:
Chris Rivers
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Quoyah v. Hudson
as 3:2019cv50291
Respondent:
Thomson USP Warden and Donald Hudson
Petitioner:
Gabriel Alexander Quoyah
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
LEE v. WARDEN USP TERRE HAUTE et al
as 2:2019cv00468
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and WARDEN USP TERRE HAUTE
Petitioner:
DANIEL LEWIS LEE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
