Cases 71 - 80 of 115
Hibbard v. USPS
as 2:2020cv10550
Plaintiff:
Rita Hibbard
Defendant:
usps
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2271
Adams et al v. United States Pipe and Foundry Company LLC et al
as 2:2015cv02046
Plaintiff:
David Adams, Detra Aqeel, Kamahrya Aqueel and others
Defendant:
United States Pipe and Foundry Company LLC, Mueller Water Products Inc and USP Holdings Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Bonebrake v. United States of America et al
as 2:2019cv01639
Defendant:
USPS Post Office, United States of America and United States Postal Service
Plaintiff:
Ellie Bonebrake
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1396
Smith v. USPS - United States Post Office
as 1:2019cv04548
Defendant:
USPS - United States Post Office
Plaintiff:
James Smith
Tatis v. United States Postal Service
as 1:2019cv11243
Plaintiff:
Gladys Tatis
Defendant:
USPS, UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and United States Postal Service
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346
Cole v. Warden of Atlanta, USP et al
as 1:2019cv00978
Defendant:
Warden of Atlanta, USP and Office of the Regional Director, Mr. Keller
Plaintiff:
James T. Cole
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Leslie Smith v. United States Postal Service et al
as 2:2019cv00636
Plaintiff:
Ms. Leslie R Smith and Leslie Smith
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,, Does, USPS and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346
Ayala-Suarez v. USPS et al
as 3:2018cv01971
Plaintiff:
Jose Luis Ayala-Suarez
Defendant:
United States of America (U.S. Postal Service) and USPS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2674
Bruce v. USPS
as 4:2018xc01019
Defendant:
USPS
Plaintiff:
Doris Bruce
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Charwa v. Rosado et al
as 1:2018cv06188
Defendant:
United States Postal Service Employees (USPS), rachel rosado, Rachel T. Rosado and others
Plaintiff:
samir charwa
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Auto Negligence
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
