Cases 11 - 20 of 3,013
Bailey v. Warden, FCC Coleman USP 1
as 5:2024cv00197
Petitioner:
Deon Anthony Romell Bailey
Respondent:
Warden, FCC Coleman USP 1
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Thompson v. USP Leavenworth
as 5:2024cv03056
Plaintiff:
Kyle M. Thompson
Defendant:
USP Leavenworth
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Dixon v. USP Big Sandy
as 7:2024cv00033
Petitioner:
Lenard Chauncy Dixon
Respondent:
Warden, USP Big Sandy
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Goodwin v. Federal Bureau of Prisons et al
as 4:2024cv00273
Plaintiff:
Joe Lewis Goodwin
Defendant:
Federal Bureau of Prisons and USP Leavenworth
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Michael Owlfeather-Gorbey v. USA, et al
as 24-5077
Plaintiff:
Michael S. Gorbey
Defendant:
United States of America, (i.e. Federal Judges), Director of the Federal Bureau of Prisons, Director Administration FBOP Grand Prairie Texas Designation Center and others
Felipe Cabrera-Huato v. USP Lompoc Warden
as 2:2024cv02892
Petitioner:
Felipe Cabrera-Huato
Respondent:
USP Lompoc Warden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Eric Krieg v. Warden, USP McCreary
as 24-5312
Petitioner:
ERIC KRIEG
Respondent:
WARDEN, USP MCCREARY
Michael Gorbey v. Geisinger Eye Center Owners & Rueters, et al
as 24-1590
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL STEVEN GORBEY, aka Michael Feather-Gorbey aka Michael Owl Feather Gorbey
Defendant:
GEISINGER EYE CENTER OWNERS & RUETERS, PATRICIA S. DODSZUWEIT, Clerk of Court U.S. App.Ct. 3rd Cir., J. OLSON, Ophthomology Doctor Geisinger Eye Center and others
Green v. Warden, USP Canaan
as 1:2024cv00131
Petitioner:
Reginald Edward Green
Respondent:
Warden, USP Canaan
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 s Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
