Cases 11 - 20 of 7,014
Angulo Estanislao v. United States Postal Service et al
as 2:2024cv03198
Plaintiff:
ANGULO ESTANISLAO
Defendant:
UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346 Tort Claim
Plunkett v. San Diego Post Office
as 3:2024cv00696
Defendant:
San Diego Post Office and United States Postal Service
Plaintiff:
Pablo Boines Plunkett
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2671 Federal Tort Claims Act (Definitions)
Holly Harper v. United States Postal Service et al
as 2:2024cv03135
Petitioner:
Holly Harper
Respondent:
United States Postal Service
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1364 Auto Negligence
DUBOSE v. UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE et al
as 2:2024cv01644
Plaintiff:
ZUMAR DUBOSE
Defendant:
UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE and U.S. ATTORNEY GENERAL
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Constitutionality of State Statute(s)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv04075
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Hall v. United States Postal Service
as 24-2361
Plaintiff:
GWENDOLYN HALL
Defendant:
UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE, Mail Fraud
B.A. v. Robertson, et al.
as 4:2024cv00195
Plaintiff:
Minor Child Brayden Albertson and United States Postal Service
Defendant:
Kathy Robertson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Tort/Motor Vehicle (P.I.)
Casanova v. Pfizer and Affiliates et al
as 3:2024cv00396
Plaintiff:
Ashley Casanova
Defendant:
Pfizer and Affiliates, Actalent Temporary Agency and Affiliates, GRAIL INC. and Affiliates and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Board of Managers of London Terrace Towers Condominium v. United States Postal Service et al
as 1:2024cv02788
Plaintiff:
Board of Managers of London Terrace Towers Condominium
Defendant:
United States Postal Service and XYZ Corp.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Notice of Removal - Suit against Federal Officer
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
