Cases 1 - 10 of 35,325
Kansas, State of et al v. United States Attorney General et al
as 2:2024cv00088
Plaintiff:
Kansas, State of, Arkansas, State of, Iowa, State of and others
Defendant:
United States Attorney General, Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives and United States Department of Justice
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv03079
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
United States of America v. $21,050 in U.S. Currency
as 0:2024cv01555
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
$21,050 in U.S. Currency
Cause Of Action: 21 U.S.C. § 841 Forfeiture Property-Drugs
United States of America v. Saverin et al
as 4:2024cv00612
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Ronald Saverin, 17 Fawn Partners LLC, Trustees of Hardwood Hills and others
Cause Of Action: 26 U.S.C. § 7403 Suit to Enforce Federal Tax Lien
Muhammad et al v. United States of America et al
as 1:2024cv00070
Plaintiff:
Kariem Qaadir Muhammad, Jamual Famin Muhammad, Danny Dermill Daniels and others
Defendant:
United States of America, Denver, City of and Aurora, City of
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
United States v. Terry Campie
as 24-1901
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Terry Marshall Campie
United States v. Phillip Rogers
as 24-1904
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Phillip Lanell Rogers
Diego Morales-Ortega v. Merrick Garland
as 24-1910
Petitioner:
Diego Herlindo Morales-Ortega
Respondent:
Merrick B. Garland, Attorney General of the United States
United States v. Miesha Stanley
as 24-1915
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Miesha Lasha Stanley
Rodrigo Bernabe-Reynoso v. United States
as 24-1905
Petitioner:
Rodrigo Bernabe-Reynoso
Respondent:
United States of America
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
