Cases 1 - 7 of 7
May v. United States, et al
as 23-1323
Plaintiff / Appellant:
UNITED STATES EX REL. SAMUEL J. MAY, an individual
Defendant / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, THE DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, an agency of the United Staes, THE DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES, an agency of the United States and others
THE COHEN FAMILY 2007 TRUST BY TRUSTEES DAVID J. COHEN AND ABRAHAM J. COHEN v. THE UNITED STATES, EX REL. THE U.S. ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS
as 3:2017cv12648
Plaintiff:
THE COHEN FAMILY 2007 TRUST BY TRUSTEES DAVID J. COHEN AND ABRAHAM J. COHEN
Defendant:
THE UNITED STATES, EX REL. THE U.S. ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2671
Hagerty v. Cyberonics, Inc.
as 16-1304
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES, ex rel, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, STATE OF COLORADO and others
Interested Party - Appellant:
ANDREW HAGERTY, ex rel
Defendant - Appellee:
CYBERONICS, INC.
US ex rel. Joseph M. Russell v. Michael Gennari
as 11-1329
Plaintiff - Appellant:
UNITED STATES EX REL. JOSEPH M. RUSSELL
Defendant - Appellee:
MICHAEL GENNARI, Ph.D., EVONNE FEI and NANCY LYNNE RUSSELL
Party-in-Interest:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
United States ex rel. et al v. Georgia Cancer Specialists I, P.C. et al
as 1:2011cv00994
Plaintiff:
United States ex rel., Natalie Raven, Christy Curtis and others
Defendant:
Georgia Cancer Specialists I, P.C., Amedisys, Inc., American Homecare Supply IV Georgia, LLC and others
Petitioner:
G. Mark Simpson and Simpson Law Firm, LLC
Cause Of Action: 31 U.S.C. § 3729 False Claims Act
United States exrel Henry Roop v. Hypoguard USA, et al
as 07-3781
Plaintiff - Appellant:
United States ex rel Henry Roop
Defendant - Appellee:
Hypoguard USA, Inc. and Medisys Group, PLC
United States Ex Rel, et al v. Angela Isley
as 1:2003cv01726
Plaintiff:
United States Ex Rel and Sheryl B. Ghrist
Defendant:
Orthoscript, Inc., James A. Nelson and Angela Isley
Cause Of Action: 31 U.S.C. § 3730 Qui Tam False Claims Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
