Cases 81 - 90 of 192
Gressens v. Ashland Foundry & Machine Works, Inc. et al
as 3:2016cv01089
Plaintiff:
Gregory Gressens
Defendant:
Ashland Foundry & Machine Works, Inc., United Steel, Paper and Forestry, Rubber, Manufacturing, Energy, Allied Industrial and Service Workers International Union AFL-CIO-CLC and United Steel Workers of America Local Union 14372
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 185
Dame et al v. Neenah Paper, Inc. et al
as 4:2016cv40029
Plaintiff:
Donald Dame , Paul Okerman , Richard Rushford and others
Defendant:
Neenah Paper, Inc. , FiberMark North America, Inc. and Crocker Technical Papers, Inc. Welfare Benefit Plan for Hourly Retirees
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 185
Reynolds et al v. Resolute Forest Products, Inc. et al (TV2)
as 1:2016cv00048
Plaintiff:
Donald Reynolds , Norman Yarber and United Steel, Paper and Forestry, Rubber, Manufacturing, Energy, Allied-Industrial and Service Workers International Union, AFL-CIO/CLC
Defendant:
Resolute Forest Products, Inc., Resolute FP US Inc., Resolute FP US Health and Welfare Benefit Plan and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1001
United Steel, Paper. Forestry, et al v. Kelsey-Hayes Company, et al
as 16-1240
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STEEL, PAPER AND FORESTRY, RUBBER, MANUFACTURING ENERGY, ALLIED INDUSTRIAL AND SERVICE WORKERS INTERNATIONAL UNION, AFL-CIO-CLC, RONALD D. STRAIT and DANNY O. STEVENS, for themselves and others similarly situated
Defendant - Appellant:
KELSEY-HAYES COMPANY, TRW AUTOMOTIVE, INC. and TRW AUTOMOTIVE HOLDINGS CORPORATION
United Steel, Paper. Forestry, et al v. Kelsey-Hayes Company, et al
as 16-1240
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STEEL, PAPER AND FORESTRY, RUBBER, MANUFACTURING, ENERGY, ALLIED INDUSTRIAL AND SERVICE WORKERS INTERNATIONAL UNION, AFL-CIO-CLC, DANNY O. STEVENS, for themselves and others similarly situated and RONALD D. STRAIT
Defendant / Appellant:
TRW AUTOMOTIVE, INC., TRW AUTOMOTIVE HOLDINGS CORPORATION and KELSEY-HAYES COMPANY
United Steel, Paper and Forestry, Rubber, Manufacturing, Energy, Allied Industrial and Service Workers International Union AFL-CIO-CLC on Behalf of Local 14693-88 v. Whistler Construction Company
as 1:2016cv00195
Plaintiff:
United Steel, Paper and Forestry, Rubber, Manufacturing, Energy, Allied Industrial and Service Workers International Union AFL-CIO-CLC on Behalf of Local 14693-88 , Pennsylvania Heavy & Highway Contractors Pension Fund and Mark A. Cummings
Defendant:
Whistler Construction Company
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
United Steel, Paper and Forestry, Rubber, Manufacturing, Energy, Allied Industrial and Service Workers International Union, AFL-CIO, CLC and its Local 4-786 v. E.I. duPont de Nemours and Co.
as 1:2016cv00013
Plaintiff:
United Steel, Paper and Forestry, Rubber, Manufacturing, Energy, Allied Industrial and Service Workers International Union, AFL-CIO, CLC and its Local 4-786
Defendant:
E.I. duPont de Nemours and Co.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 185
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2015cv00877
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Harold Dewhurst v. Century Aluminum Company
as 15-2211
Plaintiff - Appellant:
HAROLD DEWHURST, DAVID BRYAN, on behalf of themselves and all other persons similarly situated and UNITED STEEL, PAPER AND FORESTRY, RUBBER, MANUFACTURING, ENERGY, ALLIED INDUSTRIAL AND SERVICE WORKERS INTERNATIONAL UNION, AFL-CIO/CLC
Defendant - Appellee:
CENTURY ALUMINUM COMPANY, CENTURY ALUMINUM OF WEST VIRGINIA, INCORPORATED, CENTURY ALUMINUM MASTER WELFARE BENEFIT PLAN and others
UNITED STEEL, PAPER AND FORESTRY, RUBBER, MANUFACTURING, ENERGY, ALLIED INDUSTRIAL AND SERVICE WORKERS INTERNATIONAL UNION, AFL-CIO CLC v. ALLEGHENY LUDLUM LLC
as 2:2015cv01133
Plaintiff:
UNITED STEEL, PAPER AND FORESTRY, RUBBER, MANUFACTURING, ENERGY, ALLIED INDUSTRIAL AND SERVICE WORKERS INTERNATIONAL UNION, AFL-CIO CLC
Defendant:
ALLEGHENY LUDLUM LLC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 185
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
