Cases 21 - 30 of 10,473
Guzman Vela v. Medeles et al
as 1:2024at00335
Plaintiff:
Daniel Guzman Vela
Defendant:
Rey Medeles, Gustavo Gutierrez, Unknown Law Enforcement Officers and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Lamie v. Hoopes et al
as 1:2024cv00401
Plaintiff:
RESTRICTED FILER Ervin Joseph Lamie, Jr.
Defendant:
Kenneth S. Hoopes, Muskegon, County of and Unknown Parties
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Other Civil Rights
Jeremy Dunn, et al v. Shane Penfield, et al
as 24-1804
Plaintiff:
Jeremy Dunn and Kevin Love
Defendant:
Shane Penfield, in his official and individual capacities, Penfield Law Firm Professional LLC, Marty Jackley, in his individual capacity and others
Winters v. Unknown Party
as 2:2024cv00876
Plaintiff:
Tanya Winters
Defendant:
Unknown Party
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Boggs v. Range Rover et al
as 1:2024cv10983
Plaintiff:
Keon L. Boggs
Defendant:
Range Rover and Unknown Persons
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Scott v. Unknown Party
as 2:2024cv00862
Plaintiff:
Gene Edward Scott, II
Defendant:
Unknown Party
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Scott v. Unknown Party
as 2:2024cv00863
Plaintiff:
Gene Edward Scott, II
Defendant:
Unknown Party
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Meadows et al v. Haws et al
as 2:2024cv00859
Plaintiff:
Veronica Ruiz Meadows and GrandMaster G-Man Meadows
Defendant:
David Haws, Barry L Olsen, Estate of Darrell Davis/Jodi McCallister and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00856
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Aponte et al v. Bradley et al
as 1:2024cv03041
Plaintiff:
Pedro Aponte and Kate Diaz
Defendant:
Trooper Kevin Bradley and Unknown Trooper
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
