Cases 1 - 10 of 13
Brett v. Biden et al
as 5:2023cv00491
Plaintiff:
Frank Brett
Defendant:
Joe Biden, Jill Biden, Robert Rockwell and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
David Meyers v. Ms. Gaul
as 22-6592
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DAVID MEYERS
Defendant / Appellee:
MS. GAUL, CAPTAIN, LT. MS. LOCKLEAR, THE SCOTLAND CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION and others
MEYERS v. GAUL
as 1:2022cv00119
Plaintiff:
DAVID MEYERS
Defendant:
MS. GAUL, LT. MS. LOCKLEAR, THE SCOTLAND CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Brett v. Trump et al
as 1:2021cv01383
Defendant:
John Thents, Mr. Brenichre, Carl Thume and others
Plaintiff:
Frank Brett
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Meyers v. Manis et al
as 7:2021cv00314
Defendant:
Carl Manis, Officer M. Woodard, Sergeant Mr. Pauley and others
Plaintiff:
David Meyers
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Muhammad v. Gilmore et al
as 1:2020cv00279
Defendant:
J. Adams, E. Witt, Ms. Allen and others
Plaintiff:
Malcolm Muhammad
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Coleman v. Davis et al
as 7:2019cv00268
Defendant:
Unknown Black Officer, Piedmont Regional Jail Corporation, Jim Davis and others
Plaintiff:
Dominick Coleman
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
HAMBLEN v. DEPT. OF JUSTICE et al
as 1:2018cv00172
Plaintiff:
DONNA HAMBLEN
Defendant:
DEPT. OF JUSTICE, UNKNOWN WHITE HOUSE STAFF OF 42, UNKNOWN WHITE HOUSE STAFF OF 43 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Marino et al v. Saad et al
as 5:2016cv00061
Plaintiff:
Vincent Michael Marino and Juan Carlos Ortiz-Abreu
Defendant:
Jennifer Saad, Mr. Kelly, Mr. Squires and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Marino et al v. Saad et al
as 5:2016cv00061
Petitioner:
Vincent Michael Marino and Juan Carlos Ortiz-Abreu
Respondent:
Jennifer Saad, Mr. Kelly, Mr. Squires and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
