Cases 11 - 20 of 104
Thomas v. Houwman et al
as 4:2022cv04113
Plaintiff:
Johnny Jay Thomas
Defendant:
Hector Soto, Detective Nyberg, Detective Flogstad and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Young v. City of Bloomington Police Department et al
as 0:2022cv01989
Plaintiff:
Jyron Mendale Young
Defendant:
City of Bloomington Police Department, Officer Chris Wegner, City of Richfield Police Department and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Ross v. Brashers et al
as 6:2022cv03203
Plaintiff:
Joseph N Ross
Defendant:
Officer Brashers and Unknown Officer
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lofton v. Officer Marston et al
as 4:2022cv04003
Plaintiff:
Malcolm Lofton
Defendant:
Officer Marston, Unknown Officer, Jonathan Thum and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act - Civil Action for Deprivation of Rights
Thomas v. Forrest City Correctional Complex Medium et al
as 2:2022cv00003
Plaintiff:
Jason Thomas
Defendant:
Forrest City Correctional Complex Medium, John Yates, Garner and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Dortch v. Lewis et al
as 4:2021cv01160
Plaintiff:
Antonio Francisco Dortch
Defendant:
Unknown Lewis, Unknown Roland, Unknown Burris and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Brown v. Wright et al
as 4:2021cv00570
Defendant:
Winston, O'Neal, Howard and others
Plaintiff:
Byron Brown
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Williamson v. Wright et al
as 4:2021cv00568
Defendant:
Winston, O'Neal, Howard and others
Plaintiff:
Cory Williamson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Moore v. Wright et al
as 4:2021cv00566
Defendant:
Winston, Howard, O'Neal and others
Plaintiff:
Samuel Moore, III
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Vaughn v. Wright et al
as 4:2021cv00567
Defendant:
Winston, O'Neal, Howard and others
Plaintiff:
Johnny Ray Vaughn
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
