Cases 31 - 40 of 187
Brian Johnson v. Pritz Navaratnasingam, et al
as 21-35968
Plaintiff / Appellant:
BRIAN K. JOHNSON
Defendant / Appellee:
PRITZ NAVARATNASINGAM, Director V.A. Regional Office, MIKE KWAITER, Claim Adjustor, MICHAEL TEDYCH, Director of V.A. Hospital and others
CAMMELOT v. U.S. DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS et al
as 1:2021cv02823
Plaintiff:
CRAIG S CAMMELOT and CRAIG S. CAMMELOT
Defendant:
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS, DENNIS MCDONOUGH, RICHARD L. ROUDEBUSH V.A. MEDICAL CENTER and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
Ralph Brantley v. Ann Brown, et al
as 21-13442
Plaintiff / Appellant:
RALPH B. BRANTLEY
Defendant / Appellee:
ANN BROWN and V.A. HOSPITAL ADMINISTRATION
Olga Alexander v. City of Brisbane, et al
as 21-16526
Plaintiff / Appellant:
OLGA C. ALEXANDER, On Behalf of Herself and On Behalf of Her Minor Children V.A.; T.A. as Guardian Ad Litem
Defendant / Appellee:
CITY OF BRISBANE, ROBERT MALONE, in his individual capacity, ABRAHAM SEVILLA and others
Hines v. Mather V.A. Hospital
as 5:2021cv06564
Plaintiff:
Michael Hines
Defendant:
Mather V.A. Hospital
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Murphy v. V.A. Veterans Admin.
as 3:2021cv01405
Plaintiff:
Arthur Murphy
Defendant:
V.A. Veterans Admin.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Hunt v. V.A. et al
as 3:2021cv00122
Defendant:
U.S.P.S., U.A., Medicaid and others
Plaintiff:
Bennie N. Hunt, Jr.
Morrison v. Shneur et al
as 1:2021cv02096
Defendant:
V.A. Medical Center and Roman Shneur
Plaintiff:
Major Morrison
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Escolona et al v. TDCJ
as 2:2020cv00290
Plaintiff:
Jorge Sanchez, Julio Escolona, Giovanni Dastych and others
Defendant:
Ryan Collier, TDCJ, J Gaona and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
V.A. et al v. Chart Inc.
as 3:2020cv04998
Defendant:
Chart Inc.
Plaintiff:
V.B. and V.A.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
