Cases 1 - 10 of 193
Metro v. Exxon Mobil Corporation et al
as 3:2024cv00019
Respondent:
Shell PLC, Occidental Petroleum, TotalEnergies SE and others
Petitioner:
Metro
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal
State of Maryland v. Exxon Mobil Corporation et al
as 1:2018cv00459
Defendant:
Cumberland Farms, Inc., Shell Oil Products Company LLC, Chevron Corporation and others
Plaintiff:
State of Maryland
Intervenor Plaintiff:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Property Damage
State of Rhode Island v. Atlantic Richfield Company et al
as 1:2017cv00204
Defendant:
Shell Petroleum, Inc., Valero Refining-Texas, L.P., CITGO Refining and Chemicals Company L.P. and others
Plaintiff:
State of Rhode Island
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 6901 Resource & Recovery Act
County of Multnomah v. Exxon Mobil Corporation et al
as 3:2023cv01213
Defendant:
Shell PLC, Occidental Petroleum, Totalenergies Marketing USA and others
Plaintiff:
County of Multnomah
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
Persian Gulf, Inc. v. Alon USA Energy, Inc., et al
as 22-56016
Plaintiff / Appellee:
PERSIAN GULF, INC., individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated
Defendant / Appellant:
ALON USA ENERGY, INC.
Defendant:
BP WEST COAST PRODUCTS, LLC, CHEVRON U.S.A. INC., TESORO REFINING & MARKETING COMPANY, LLC and others
Diagnositc Affiliates of Northeast Hou, LLC v. United Health Group,Inc. et al
as 2:2021cv00131
Counter Claimant:
Siemens Corporation Group Insurance and Flexible Benefits Program, Kellogg Brown & Root, Inc. Welfare Benefits Plan, Brookdale Senior Living, Inc. Welfare Plan and others
Defendant:
AT&T Umbrella Benefit Plan No.1, Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom Partners' Welfare Benefits Plan, Apple Inc. Health and Welfare Benefit Plan and others
Plaintiff:
Diagnositc Affiliates of Northeast Hou, LLC dba 24 Hour Covid RT-PCR Laboratory and Diagnostic Affiliates of Northeast Hou, LLC doing business as 24 Hour COVIDRT-PCR Laboratory
Cross Defendant:
OptumHealth Care Solutions, Inc. and UHG, Inc, Group Benefits Plan
Cross Claimant:
Envision Healthcare Corporation Welfare Benefits Plan
Counter Defendant:
Diagnostic Affiliates of Northeast Hou, LLC
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962 Racketeering (RICO) Act
National Farmers Union v. EPA, et al
as 16-1056
Respondent:
Environmental Protection Agency, E. Scott Pruitt, Administrator and Regina A. McCarthy, Administrator
Amicus Curiae:
Canola Council of Canada, Small Retailers Coalition, American Soybean Association and others
Intervenor:
U.S. Oil & Refining Co., Valero Energy Corporation, Alon Refining Krotz Springs, Inc. and others
Petitioner:
National Farmers Union
Valero Energy Corporation v. EPA
as 16-1054
Amicus Curiae:
Arvegenix, Inc., Canola Council of Canada, Small Retailers Coalition and others
Respondent:
Environmental Protection Agency
Intervenor:
Growth Energy, Biotechnology Innovation Organization, U.S. Oil & Refining Co. and others
Petitioner:
Valero Energy Corporation
Americans for Clean Energy, et al v. EPA, et al
as 16-1005
Respondent:
Environmental Protection Agency, E. Scott Pruitt, Administrator and Regina A. McCarthy, Administrator
Intervenor:
American Petroleum Institute, E.I. du Pont de Nemours and Company, U.S. Oil & Refining Co. and others
Amicus Curiae:
Canola Council of Canada, Small Retailers Coalition, Arvegenix, Inc. and others
Petitioner:
National Sorghum Producers, Growth Energy, National Corn Growers Association and others
Alon Refining Krotz Springs, et al v. EPA
as 16-1049
Petitioner:
Wyoming Refining Company, Alon Refining Krotz Springs, Inc., Ergon-West Virginia, Inc. and others
Respondent:
Environmental Protection Agency
Amicus Curiae:
Canola Council of Canada, Small Retailers Coalition, American Soybean Association and others
Intervenor:
Growth Energy, Biotechnology Innovation Organization, Americans for Clean Energy and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
