Cases 21 - 30 of 56
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2015cv00135
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Edrosa v. Paramo et al
as 3:2014cv02912
Plaintiff:
Bernardo Edrosa
Defendant:
Daniel Paramo, R. Anderson, Gallindo and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Centeno v. Bridgeport et al
as 3:2014cv01779
Plaintiff:
Edwin Centeno
Defendant:
City of Bridgeport , Board of Education , Paul G. Vallas and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Centeno v. City of Bridgeport et al
as 5:2014cv01760
Defendant:
Board of Education City of Bridgeport, Paul Vallas and Lawrence Richardson
Plaintiff:
Edwin Centeno
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2014cv01484
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Caputo v. PEC Security Group of NY, Inc. et al
as 7:2014cv04698
Plaintiff:
Wanda Caputo
Defendant:
PEC Security Group of NY, Inc. and Rafael Vallae
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Mount Vernon Fire Ins Co v. El Rancho De Pancho LLC
as 13-4757
Plaintiff - Appellee:
Mount Vernon Fire Ins Co
Defendant:
El Rancho De Pancho LLC
Defendant - Appellant:
George Vallas, Administrator of the Estate of Nick E. Vallas
West Virginia CWP Fund v. Valla Loudermilk
as 13-2311
Petitioner:
WEST VIRGINIA CWP FUND, as carrier for LAFAYETTE SPRINGS ENTERPRISES, INC.
Respondent:
VALLA JEAN LOUDERMILK, on behalf of and surviving spouse of Harold E. Loudermilk and DIRECTOR, OFFICE OF WORKERS' COMPENSATION PROGRAMS, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF LABOR
Green v. Mentor Worldwide LLC et al
as 2:2013cv18534
Plaintiff:
Valla Green
Defendant:
Mentor Worldwide LLC and Coloplast Corp.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Green v. Mentor Worldwide LLC et al
as WVS/2:13-cv-18534
Plaintiff:
Valla Green
Defendant:
Mentor Worldwide LLC and Coloplast Corp.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
