Cases 1 - 10 of 23
Larry Meitzner v. City of Sterling Heights, MI, et al
as 22-1634
Plaintiff / Appellant:
LARRY A. MEITZNER
Defendant / Appellee:
CITY OF STERLING HEIGHTS, MI and MARK VANDERPOOL, City Manager
STERLING HEIGHTS HOTELS, LLC v. CITY OF STERLING HEIGHTS et al
as 2:2020cv13116
Defendant:
CITY OF STERLING HEIGHTS, SHAWN ALLEN and MARK VANDERPOOL
Plaintiff:
STERLING HEIGHTS HOTELS, LLC
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Vanderpool v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2019cv01992
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Daniel Vanderpool
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Vanderpool v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 3:2018cv00573
Plaintiff:
Evelyn M. Vanderpool
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Hutchinson et al v. Muskegon River Youth Home, Inc. et al
as 1:2018cv00647
Plaintiff:
Lisa Hutchinson and John Vanderpool
Defendant:
Muskegon River Youth Home, Inc., Dawn Kruithoff, Brandon Beard and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Estes v. Vanderpool Construction and Roofing, Inc. et al (TWP1)
as 2:2017cv00058
Plaintiff:
William Estes
Defendant:
Vanderpool Construction and Roofing, Inc. and Bill Vanderpool
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Lantz v. Vanderpool Construction and Roofing, Inc.
as 2:2017cv00024
Plaintiff:
Jake Lantz
Defendant:
Vanderpool Construction and Roofing, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1938
Vanderpool-Helton v. Fayette County Detention Center et al
as 5:2016cv00354
Plaintiff:
Felisha Vanderpool-Helton
Defendant:
Jeremy Abney
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
George v. Litteral et al
as 0:2015cv00095
Plaintiff:
James Edward George, Jr.
Defendant:
Kathy Litteral, Gary Beckstrom, Mark Noble and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Dotson v. Lenawee et al
as 2:2015cv11850
Plaintiff:
Russell Dotson
Defendant:
County of Lenawee, Dennis Steenrod, Stephen Stocker and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
