Cases 11 - 20 of 5,844
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2024cv00879
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans With Disabilities Act
Wah v. Vargas et al
as 1:2024cv03146
Plaintiff:
John Joseph Hop Wah
Defendant:
Javier E. Vargas, Antonolla Papaloo, Nicole Wint-Baksh and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Moliere Dimanche, Jr. v. Takela Jackson, et al
as 24-11267
Plaintiff:
MOLIERE DIMANCHE, JR.
Defendant:
TAKELA JACKSON, RABIH TABBARA, NICOLAS LUCIANO MONTES and others
Galan, Jr. v. OCGV, LLC. dba Texas Crime Management et al
as 5:2024cv00427
Plaintiff:
Joel Galan, Jr.
Defendant:
OCGV, LLC. dba Texas Crime Management and Oscar Vargas
USA v. Aguirre Vargas
as 24-40266
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Ivan Dario Aguirre Vargas
Comer v. Holliman et al
as 2:2024cv02083
Plaintiff:
Malcolm Comer
Defendant:
Rhonda Holliman, Regan Rodke, BN #518 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Aguilera Diaz et al v. Svihel et al
as 0:2024cv01483
Plaintiff:
Allan Juseth Aguilera Diaz, Nahun Alexander Barahona Amador, Jerson Ariel Betanco Flores and others
Defendant:
John J. Svihel and Svihel Vegetable Farms, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1595 Civil Remedies: Human Trafficking
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv01179
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Vargas v. Rivers
as 4:2024cv00329
Petitioner:
Joel Vargas
Respondent:
Warden FNU Rivers
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Gregor (PS) v. Community Corrections et al
as 1:2024cv01045
Petitioner:
Daniel Pat Gregor
Respondent:
Community Corrections, Independence House, Arlene Duram and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 st - Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
