Cases 21 - 30 of 7,877
Vasquez v. Doe et al
as 3:2024cv00589
Plaintiff:
Alexander Vasquez
Defendant:
John Doe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(PC) Howard v. Komaki, et al.
as 1:2024cv00386
Plaintiff:
Karlis Ruben Augustus Howard
Defendant:
Emi Komaki, BD Young, C Caldua and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Vasquez v. Mitchell, et al.
as 24-1957
Plaintiff:
JUAN RUBIO VASQUEZ
Defendant:
RACHEL MITCHELL, Maricopa County Attorney and ROSEMARIE PENA-LYNCH, Maricopa County Legal Defense Attorney
Vasquez v. O'Malley
as 24-50233
Plaintiff:
Monica Vasquez
Defendant:
Martin O'Malley, Commissioner of Social Security
Vasquez v. Horizon Therapeutics USA, Inc.
as 1:2024cv02554
Plaintiff:
Carol Vasquez
Defendant:
Horizon Therapeutics USA, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Peleus Insurance Company v. Allied World Surplus Lines Insurance Company et al
as 1:2024cv02394
Plaintiff:
Peleus Insurance Company
Defendant:
Allied World Surplus Lines Insurance Company, 333 PARK SLOPE CONDOS, LLC, ROGERS & DAWSON BUILDING COMPANY LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 jd Diversity-Declaratory Judgement
Vasquez-Rojas v. Garland
as 24-808
Petitioner:
ELSA AZUCENA VASQUEZ-ROJAS and VICENTE OLIVO LEMA YANZA
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, UNITED STATES ATTORNEY GENERAL
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00382
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Vargo et al v. EVO Transportation & Energy Services, Inc. et al
as 1:2024cv00301
Plaintiff:
Steven Vargo, Damian Vasquez, Candice Cooke and others
Defendant:
EVO Transportation & Energy Services, Inc. and EVO Services Group, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Other Contract
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00326
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
