Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Vernell Johnson v. Randy Ground
as 13-72798
Petitioner:
VERNELL JOHNSON
Respondent:
RANDY GROUNDS, Warden
Vernell Johnson v. The People of the State of California
as 2:2013cv03402
Petitioner:
Vernell Johnson
Respondent:
The People of the State of California
Lee v. Queen Anne's County, Maryland et al
as 1:2013cv00672
Plaintiff:
Traee Daran Lee
Defendant:
Queen Anne's County, Maryland , Deputy Vernell Johnson and State of Maryland
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Franklin Reaves, et al v. Black Farmers Assoc. Settle, et al
as 12-5313
Plaintiff - Appellee:
Franklin C. Reaves, Roger Arnold, Cassandra Graham and others
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Sarah Simon-Arnold, Reverend
Defendant - Appellee:
Black Farmers Association Settlement Administrator and EPIQ Class Action & Claims Solutions, Inc.
REAVES et al v. BLACK FARMERS ASSOCIATION SETTLEMENT ADMINISTRATOR
as 1:2012cv00955
Plaintiff:
FRANKLIN C. REAVES, SARAH SIMON-ARNOLD, ROGER ARNOLD and others
Defendant:
BLACK FARMERS ASSOCIATION SETTLEMENT ADMINISTRATOR
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Johnson v. US Attorney General
as 2:2011cv02418
Petitioner:
Vernell Johnson
Respondent:
US Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Agim v. Adams et al
as 2:2009cv00171
Plaintiff:
Chima Agim
Defendant:
John H Adams, Jamie L Baker, Paul W Sloan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
JOHNSON v. E.D. BULLARD et al
as 2:2008cv60260
Plaintiff:
VERNELL JOHNSON, VERNELL JOHNSON, VERNELL JOHNSON and others
Defendant:
E.D. BULLARD, ATLAS TURNER, INC., ATLAS TURNER, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
Johnson v. Progressive Cas Ins, et al
as 1:2004cv01037
Plaintiff:
Vernell Johnson
Defendant:
Progressive Casualty Insurance Company and Progressive Preferred Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Insurance Contract
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
