Cases 1 - 10 of 15
MILLER v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2021cv28564
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
RODGER VERNON MILLER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
MILLER v. SORBER et al
as 5:2020cv05598
Respondent:
SUPT. JAMES SORBER, THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF MONTGOMERY COUNTY LEHIGH COUNTY and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF _______________________
Petitioner:
VERNON MILLER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
MILLER, JR. v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 8:2020cv72337
Plaintiff:
VERNON MILLER, JR.
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2019cv04059
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2019cv00492
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 12 U.S.C. § 2607
Miller et al v. Kanawha River Railroad, L.L.C., et al
as 2:2018cv01367
Plaintiff:
Vernon Miller, Jr. and Cora Miller
Defendant:
Kanawha River Railroad, L.L.C. and Norfolk Southern Railway Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Miller et al v. Boston Scientific Corporation
as 2:2018cv00551
Plaintiff:
Kay Frances Miller and Vernon Miller
Defendant:
Boston Scientific Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Adrian Eaglin v. McCall
as 16-7171
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ADRIAN T. EAGLIN
Defendant - Appellee:
MCCALL, Sergeant
Defendant:
LARRY CARTLEDGE, Warden, FLORENCE MAUNEY, Assistant Warden, CURTIS EARLLY and others
Eaglin v. Sterling et al
as 0:2014cv04003
Plaintiff:
Adrian T Eaglin
Defendant:
Bryant Sterling, Larry Cartledge, Florence Mauney and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights, State Filers
Pelzer v. McCall et al
as 8:2010cv02484
Plaintiff:
Thomas Lee Pelzer
Defendant:
Michael McCall , Miriam Cocciolone , Florence Mauney and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
