Cases 1 - 8 of 8
MUNOZ v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 9:2023cv20324
Plaintiff:
VINCENT MUNOZ
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Paul Harcz, Jr., et al v. Brody Boucher, et al
as 21-1664
Plaintiff / Appellee:
PAUL JOSEPH HARCZ, JR., ELEANOR CANTER, BRIAN DIAN and others
Defendant / Appellant:
BRODY BOUCHER, JASON WILLIAMS, JEFF HELD and others
Defendant:
MICHIGAN ASSOCIATION OF CENTERS FOR INDEPENDENT LIVING and HANDICAPPER ADVOCACY ALLIANCE, INC.
BRETZ et al v 3M COMPANY et al
as 3:2019cv02964
Plaintiff:
CONRAD MOORE, SETH WILLFORD, BENJAMIN PRICE and others
Defendant:
3M COMPANY and AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 pl
Bretz et al v. 3M Company et al
as 0:2019cv01996
Plaintiff:
Conrad Moore, Seth Willford, Benjamin Price and others
Defendant:
3M Company and Aearo Technologies LLC
Harcz, Jr. et al v. Boucher et al
as 1:2017cv00112
Plaintiff:
Paul Joseph Harcz, Jr. , Eleanor Canter , Brian Dian and others
Defendant:
Brody Boucher, Jason Williams, Jeff Held and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MUNOZ v. FOSTER WHEELER COMPANY, ET AL
as 2:2011cv51223
Plaintiff:
VINCENT MUNOZ
Defendant:
FOSTER WHEELER COMPANY, ET AL
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 0688
In re: Mt Holly Gardens Citizens, et al v. Twp Mount Holly, et al
as 11-1159
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MOUNT HOLLY GARDENS CITIZENS IN ACTION INC
Plaintiff - Appellee:
PEDRO AROCHO, CHRISTINE BARNES, BERNICE CAGLE and others
Defendant - Appellee:
TWP MOUNT HOLLY, TWP CNCL OF MOUNT HOLLY, KEATING URBAN PARTNERS and others
MT HOLLY GARDENS CITIZENS IN ACTION, INC. et al v. TOWNSHIP OF MOUNT HOLLY et al
as 1:2008cv02584
Plaintiff:
MT HOLLY GARDENS CITIZENS IN ACTION, INC., PEDRO AROCHO, REYNALDO AROCHO and others
Defendant:
TOWNSHIP OF MOUNT HOLLY, TOWNSHIP COUNCIL OF TOWNSHIP OF MOUNT HOLLY, KATHLEEN HOFFMAN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Fair Housing Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
