Cases 11 - 19 of 19
Heimer et al v. Virtual Radiologic Professionals, LLC et al
as 3:2015cv00773
Plaintiff:
William E. Heimer and Linda J. Heimer
Defendant:
Virtual Radiologic Professionals, LLC , Virtual Radiologic Corporation and Thomas F. Firoito
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Virtual Radiologic Corporation v. Tandem Radiology et al
as 1:2014mc00027
Plaintiff:
Virtual Radiologic Corporation
Defendant:
Tandem Radiology, Imaging Advantage, LLC and Direct Radiology, LLC
Movant:
Pro Scan Imaging, LLC
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2013cv09203
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Virtual Radiologic Corporation et al v. Tandem Radiology LLC et al
as 2:2013cv01705
Plaintiff:
Virtual Radiologic Corporation and NightHawk Radiology Services LLC
Defendant:
Tandem Radiology LLC, Imaging Advantage LLC, Direct Radiology LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
Purdom v. Muhlenberg Community Hospital et al
as 4:2013cv00014
Plaintiff:
Vanessa A. Purdom
Defendant:
Muhlenberg Community Hospital, Muhlenberg Surgical Associates, Muhlenberg Medical Property II, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Medical Malpractice
Koontz v. Radiologists On Call, LLC et al
as 8:2012cv00407
Plaintiff:
Lori Koontz
Defendant:
Radiologists On Call, LLC , Virtual Radiologic Corporation, Ira M. Tyler and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Clayton v. Engert et al
as 2:2010cv02274
Plaintiff:
Ron Clayton
Defendant:
David Engert , David Brophy , Peter Chung and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Dr. Systems, Inc. v. Avreo, Inc. et al
as 3:2009cv00565
Plaintiff:
Dr. Systems, Inc.
Defendant:
Avreo, Inc., Candelis, Inc., Cerner Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Merge Emed, Inc. v. Virtual Radiologic Corproation
as 1:2007cv01798
Plaintiff:
Merge eMed, Inc., Merge eMed, Inc. and Merge eMed, Inc.
Defendant:
Virtual Radiologic Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1338 Patent Infringement
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
