Cases 1 - 10 of 20
BANKS v. ROGERS et al
as 1:2022cv00602
Petitioner:
MITCHELL DANYELL BANKS
Respondent:
DANNY ROGERS, D.W. COOKE, W.M. EVANS and others
Defendant:
TRAVELERS CASUALTY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Joseph Moore v. W.M. Pollard, et al
as 22-55538
Petitioner / Appellant:
JOSEPH C. MOORE
Respondent / Appellee:
W.M. POLLARD and ATTORNEY GENERAL FOR THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA
Kirlin v. United States Marshal Service et al
as 2:2022cv00171
Plaintiff:
Christopher W.M. Kirlin
Defendant:
United States Marshal Service, Fugitive Task Force and Unknown Parties
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Engle et al v. Mondt et al
as 1:2022cv00387
Plaintiff:
Brian Edward Engle
Defendant:
Detective Frederick Mondt, Detective Brian Krotser, Sheriff Kelley and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Moss v. Zuidema et al
as 7:2021cv00234
Defendant:
Officer C.N. Harris, Officer Rippy, The City of Lynchburg and others
Plaintiff:
Keith Edward Moss
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Joseph C. Moore v. WM Pollard et al
as 2:2019cv07771
Respondent:
Attorney General California and W.M. Pollard
Petitioner:
Joseph C. Moore and Joseph C Moore
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Moore v. Pollard et al
as 3:2019cv01676
Respondent:
W.M. Pollard and Attorney General, California
Petitioner:
Joseph C. Moore
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Alexander v. Collins et al
as 7:2019cv00261
Defendant:
Harold Clarke, C/O Maloney, C/O Messer and others
Plaintiff:
Antonari William Alexander
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Edward B. Spencer v. Kokol
as 1:2017cv01561
Plaintiff:
Edward B Spencer
Defendant:
W.M. Kokol
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2017cv00800
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
