Cases 1 - 10 of 8,920
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00234
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans with Disabilities Act
Ferguson v. Walgreens Co. et al
as 3:2024cv00564
Plaintiff:
Travonsha L. Ferguson
Defendant:
Walgreens Co. doing business as Walgreens and John Doe
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal- Personal Injury
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv03656
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal - Employment Discrimination
LJL Holdings Lithonia LLC v. Walgreen Co.
as 1:2024cv01936
Plaintiff:
LJL Holdings Lithonia LLC
Defendant:
Walgreen Co.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Declaratory Judgment
JASKULSKI v. ACETERIS, LLC et al
as 1:2024cv05752
Plaintiff:
Robert Jaskulski
Defendant:
ACETERIS, LLC, ACTAVIS PHARMA, INC., ACTAVIS, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Shaw v. Dermatology Realm et al
as 2:2024cv02271
Plaintiff:
Tekeva Shaw
Defendant:
Dermatology Realm, Clarx Big Country Dermatology, Memphis Dermatology and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Butler v. Walgreen Co.
as 2:2024cv00134
Plaintiff:
Mickie Butler
Defendant:
Walgreen Co.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
James-Davis v. Walgreens Boots Alliance Inc
as 3:2024cv00998
Plaintiff:
Jolinda James-Davis
Defendant:
Walgreens Boots Alliance Inc doing business as Walgreens Store #10193
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Walgreen Co vs Therabody, Inc
as 1:2024cv03218
Plaintiff:
Walgreen Co
Defendant:
Therabody, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Other Contract
Curtis v. Walgreen, Co
as 7:2024cv02291
Plaintiff:
Shannon Curtis
Defendant:
Walgreen, Co
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Notice of Removal-Personal Injury
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
