Cases 21 - 30 of 2,911
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv00519
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00013
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination
Walters v. State Farm Lloyds
as 6:2024cv00053
Plaintiff:
Richard Walters
Defendant:
State Farm Lloyds
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Insurance Contract
Portillo-Jandres v. Garland
as 24-60054
Petitioner:
Walter De Los Angeles Portillo-Jandres
Respondent:
Merrick Garland, U.S. Attorney General
DuBose v. Campbell et al
as 3:2024cv00120
Plaintiff:
Walter Allen DuBose
Defendant:
Paul Campbell, Donna Norman, Chris Jenkins and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Dubose v. Campbell et al
as 2:2024cv00267
Plaintiff:
Walter Allen Dubose
Defendant:
Paul Campbell, Donna Norman, Chris Jenkins and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Mcdade v. Fountains at Tidwell
as 24-20033
Plaintiff:
Selena E. Mcdade, Kiarra A. Farwell, Spencer Farwell and others
Defendant:
Fountains at Tidwell Limited, Issac Matthews, Hittig Management Corporation and others
Rios v. Walters et al
as 5:2024cv00030
Plaintiff:
John Gabriel Rios
Defendant:
Darren Walters, FNU LNU 5:24-CV-30 (1), Wanda Mason and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Haufler et al v. Sibley
as 4:2024cv00228
Plaintiff:
Walter William Haufler and LaDonna Florin Haufler
Defendant:
Adrian Sibley
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Secherest et al v. City of Lexington et al
as 3:2024cv00034
Plaintiff:
Leroy Secherest, Damion Levy, Tyqwon Walden and others
Defendant:
City of Lexington, Robin McRory, Charles Henderson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
