Cases 1 - 10 of 14,262
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv02126
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990
Ward v. Ford Motor Company et al
as 3:2024cv01790
Defendant:
Does 1 through 50 and Ford Motor Company
Plaintiff:
Sara Ward
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 bc Removal- Breach of Contract
Ward v. Harpstead et al
as 0:2024cv03845
Respondent:
Nancy Johnston, Terry Kneisel and Jodi Harpstead
Petitioner:
Earl L. Ward
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Beaulieu, Jr v. Shelby County, Alabama et al
as 2:2024cv01361
Defendant:
Shelby County, Alabama, Chad Scroggins, Jon Parker and others
Plaintiff:
Henri N Beaulieu, Jr
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Heirloom Trust (PS) v. Hargrave et al
as 1:2024cv02749
Defendant:
Stephanie Ward, Look East Realty, National Association of Realtors and others
Plaintiff:
Heirloom Trust and M.A.Y.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans With Disabilities Act (ADA)
Carey et al v. Moe et al
as 1:2024cv07551
Defendant:
Michael Moe, Peter B. Ritz, LZG International, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Edward Reinle, Shawn Carey, Zitah McMillan-Ward and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78 m(a) Securities Exchange Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv09443
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Ramon Ward v. Wayne County, MI, et al
as 24-1830
Defendant:
MONICA CHILDS, WAYNE COUNTY, MI, et al. and DALE COLLINS
Plaintiff:
RAMON WARD
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv02806
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451 Employment Discrimination
Hayden v. Calhoun
as 3:2024cv00600
Defendant:
Ward Calhoun
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Plaintiff:
Owen Michael Hayden, III
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
