Cases 1 - 10 of 16
Marchant v. Anglea
as 4:2019cv06831
Defendant:
Warden Hunter Anglea
Petitioner:
David Alan Marchant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Stanislav Kirsanov et al v. H. Anglea et al
as 2:2019cv00989
Defendant:
H. Anglea, S. Kernan, California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation and others
Plaintiff:
Stanislav Kirsanov and Evgenia Kirsanov
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Carter v. Anglea
as 3:2019cv00429
Respondent:
Hunter Anglea and Warden Hunter Anglea
Petitioner:
Johnell Lee Carter
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Ricky Justice v. Warden Harris, et al
as 17-41093
Plaintiff - Appellant:
RICKY BARNARD JUSTICE
Defendant - Appellee:
WARDEN HARRIS, CORRECTIONAL OFFICER MCKINNEY, CORRECTIONAL OFFICER LEBEAU and others
Rankins v. Farmville City et al
as 3:2017cv00288
Plaintiff:
Michael Rankins
Defendant:
Farmville City, Prince Edwards County, Peidmont Reginonal Jail and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
McCaskill v. Moore et al
as 3:2017cv00353
Plaintiff:
Stephen Douglas McCaskill
Defendant:
C/O Moore, Lt. Christopher, C/O Langston and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ricky Justice v. Lorie Davis, et al
as 17-40171
Plaintiff - Appellant:
RICKY BARNARD JUSTICE
Defendant - Appellee:
LORIE DAVIS, DIRECTOR, TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE, CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTIONS DIVISION, WILLIAM STEPHENS, Warden, WARDEN HARRIS and others
Justice v. Stephens et al
as 9:2016cv00167
Plaintiff:
Ricky Barnard Justice
Defendant:
William Stephens, Warden Harris, Co. McKinney and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Raymond Carr v. William Stephens, et al
as 14-20484
Plaintiff - Appellant:
RAYMOND E. CARR
Defendant - Appellee:
WILLIAM STEPHENS, WARDEN HUNTER, MENTAL HEALTH MANAGER CHANCELLOR and others
Carr v. Stephens et al
as 4:2014cv01286
Plaintiff:
Raymond E Carr
Defendant:
William Stephens, Warden Hunter, Mental Health Manager, Chancellor and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
