Cases 1 - 10 of 61
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv03013
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question
City of Orlando, Florida v. CVS Health Corporation et al
as 1:2020op45223
Defendant:
Cardinal Health 105, Inc., Actavis Laboratories UT, Inc., McKesson Corporation and others
Plaintiff:
The City of Orlando, Florida
The City of Orlando, Florida v. CVS Health Corporation et al
as 6:2020cv00736
Defendant:
CVS Orlando FL Distribution, L.L.C., Actavis Laboratories UT, Inc., McKesson Corporation and others
Plaintiff:
The City of Orlando, Florida
Cause Of Action: 21 U.S.C. § 801
Mitchell v. Allergan USA, Inc. et al
as 3:2020cv00183
Defendant:
Baptist Health Medical Group, Inc., Baptist Health Medical Group, Louisville Physicians for Women, Warner Chilcott Sales (US), LLC and others
Plaintiff:
Helen Mitchell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
City of Providence, et al v. Warner Chilcott (US), LLC, et al
as 19-8026
Petitioner:
WARNER CHILCOTT SALES (US), LLC, WATSON PHARMACEUTICALS, INC., WARNER CHILCOTT PUBLIC LIMITED COMPANY and others
Plaintiff:
KROGER COMPANY, MARY ALEXANDER, a resident citizen of the State of North Carolina, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, WALGREEN CO. and others
Respondent:
ELECTRICAL WORKERS 242 & 294 HEALTH & WELFARE FUND, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, UNITED FOOD AND COMMERCIAL WORKERS LOCAL 1776 & PARTICIPATING EMPLOYERS HEALTH AND WELFARE FUND, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, LABORERS INTERNATIONAL UNION OF NORTH AMERICA LOCAL 35 HEALTH CARE FUND, on behalf of itself and all others similarly situated and others
Interested Party:
BAYER HEALTHCARE, LLC,, CAREMARK, LLC and CVS HEALTH CORPORATION
Defendant:
ALLERGAN, PLC, WARNER CHILCOTT HOLDINGS COMPANY III, LTD., LUPIN LTD. and others
Ahold U.S.A., Inc. v. Warner Chilcott Public Limited, et al
as 19-8014
Petitioner:
WARNER CHILCOTT SALES (US), LLC, WARNER CHILCOTT PUBLIC LIMITED COMPANY, WATSON PHARMACEUTICALS, INC. and others
Plaintiff:
KROGER COMPANY, TEAMSTERS LOCAL 237 WELFARE BENEFITS FUND, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, MARY ALEXANDER, a resident citizen of the State of North Carolina, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated and others
Interested Party:
BAYER HEALTHCARE, LLC,, CAREMARK, LLC and CVS HEALTH CORPORATION
Defendant:
ALLERGAN, PLC, LUPIN LTD., WARNER CHILCOTT CORPORATION and others
Respondent:
AHOLD U.S.A., INC.
Amicus Curiae:
NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF MANUFACTURERS, ASSOCIATION FOR ACCESSIBLE MEDICINES, PHARMACEUTICAL RESEARCH AND MANUFACTURERS OF AMERICA and others
Rochester Drug Co-Operative, Inc. v. Warner Chilcott Company, LLC et al
as 1:2018mc00025
Plaintiff:
Rochester Drug Co-Operative, Inc. and Direct Purchaser Class
Defendant:
Warner Chilcott Company, LLC , Warner Chilcott (US), LLC , Warner Chilcott Sales (US), LLC and others
In Re: Loestrin 24 FE Antitrust Litigation
as 1:2018mc22581
Defendant:
Loestrin 24 FE Antitrust Litigation, Warner Chilcott Holdings Company III, Ltd., Warner Chilcott plc n/k/a Allergan WC Ireland Holdings, Ltd. and others
Petitioner:
Laurence F. Doud, III
In Re:
IN RE: LOESTRIN 24 FE ANTITRUST LITIGATION
Cause Of Action: Motion to Quash
Warner Chilcott Sales (US), LLC et al v. EnvisionRxOptions et al
as 1:2018mc00022
Petitioner:
Warner Chilcott Sales (US), LLC, Warner Chilcott U.S., LLC, Warner Chicott Laboratories Ireland Limited and others
Respondent:
EnvisionRxOptions and Envision Rx Options Holdings, Inc.
Warner Chilcott Sales (US), LLC et al v. EnvisionRxOptions et al
as 5:2018mc00038
Petitioner:
Warner Chilcott Sales (US), LLC, Warner Chicott Laboratories Ireland Limited, Watson Laboratories, Inc. and others
Respondent:
EnvisionRxOptions and Envision Rx Options Holdings, Inc.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
