Cases 1 - 9 of 9
John Doe A, et al v. Gretchen Whitmer, et al
as 25-1413
Plaintiff:
MARY DOE, JOHN DOE A, JOHN DOE B and others
Defendant:
JAMES GRADY, II, Colonel and GRETCHEN WHITMER, Governor of the State of Michigan
Amicus Curiae:
WILLIAM ARAIZA, ERIC JANUS, SANDRA MAYSON and others
John Doe A, et al v. Gretchen Whitmer, et al
as 25-1414
Plaintiff:
MARY DOE, JOHN DOE A, JOHN DOE B and others
Defendant:
JAMES GRADY, II, Colonel and GRETCHEN WHITMER, Governor of the State of Michigan
Amicus Curiae:
WILLIAM ARAIZA, ERIC JANUS, SANDRA MAYSON and others
USA v. Logan
as 23-40523
Plaintiff / Appellee:
United States of America
Defendant / Appellant:
Jeremy Wayne Logan
John Fredrich Longo et al v. 3M Company, The et al
as 2:2023cv01744
Defendant:
3M Company, The, Du Pont De Nemours Inc, UTC Fire & Security Americas Corporation Inc and others
Plaintiff:
John Fredrich Longo, Gregory Kevin Martin, Leon W Henderson and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Notice of Removal-Personal Injury
US v. Charles Logan
as 21-6330
Defendant / Appellant:
CHARLES WAYNE LOGAN
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Logan v. USA - 2255
as 1:2010cv03065
Petitioner:
Wayne Logan
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
LINCOLN BENEFIT LIFE COMPANY v. LOGAN et al
as 2:2010cv05254
Plaintiff:
LINCOLN BENEFIT LIFE COMPANY
Defendant:
BRUCE WAYNE LOGAN, SAMUEL LEE LOGAN, JAMES RAYMOND LOGAN and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
USA v. Lawrence Logan
as 08-2618
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
LAWRENCE WAYNE LOGAN, a/k/a Larry Logan a/k/a Robert Logan
Logan v. United States Federal Government et al
as 1:2007cv01754
Plaintiff:
Lawrence Wayne Logan
Defendant:
United States Federal Government, Thomas A. Marino, William C. Simmers and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
